On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 07:15:47PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> As most of you know I'm working on usb redirection (making client usb
> devices
> accessible in guests over the network).
>
> I thought it would be a good idea to write a short status report.
>
> So fat the following h
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 09:35:20AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> We certainly going to need the drm_need_swiotlb() for userptr support
> (unless we add some approach for drivers to opt out of swiotlb).
swiotlb use is driven by three things:
1) addressing limitations of the device
2) addressi
violation where the TTM pool assumes what
kind of virtual address dma_alloc_attrs can return.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h | 1 -
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c | 4 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v6_0.c | 1 -
drivers/gpu/drm/amd
Hi all,
the memory allocation for the TTM pool is a big mess with two allocation
methods that both have issues, a layering violation and odd guessing of
pools in the callers.
This patch switches to the dma_alloc_noncoherent API instead fixing all
of the above issues.
Warning: i don't have any o
