Re: [Spice-devel] Spice protocol behind a Firewall

2017-02-19 Thread Uri Lublin
On 02/19/2017 08:07 AM, Oscar Segarra wrote: Hi, First of all, I'd like to say that I'm not sure enough I'm writing to the correct mailing list, I have not been able to find a common users mailing list. I'm planning to deploy a VDI solution based on SPICE. I'd like to grant access through the I

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH spice-gtk] gtk-session: Set value directly

2017-02-19 Thread Uri Lublin
On 02/17/2017 06:17 PM, Pavel Grunt wrote: On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 10:01 -0600, Jonathon Jongsma wrote: On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 13:44 +0100, Pavel Grunt wrote: Spotted by coverity Acked-by: Jonathon Jongsma out of curiosity, what did coverity actually say here? spice-gtk-0.33.53-7cb7-dirty/s

Re: [Spice-devel] Spice protocol behind a Firewall

2017-02-19 Thread Oscar Segarra
Hi Uri, Is there any public documentation for configuring the http/https proxy? In my scenario, I have 2 hypervisors and I don't know exactly how to redirect each port to each hypervisor. And regarding your comments, host_ip and host_port (in first and second command) belong to the reverse proxy

[Spice-devel] [PATCH v2 spice-gtk 1/2] authentication: Handle failed SASL authentication separately

2017-02-19 Thread Snir Sheriber
Remove handling with failures in the SASL authentication process to separate function --- src/spice-channel.c | 44 +++- 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/spice-channel.c b/src/spice-channel.c index af67931..cbf1291 100644 -

[Spice-devel] [PATCH v2 spice-gtk 2/2] authentication: Handle failed spice authentication

2017-02-19 Thread Snir Sheriber
Changing the name of the function that now handles failures in the spice authentication process separately from the sasl authentication failures and display more suitable error message. Resolves: rhbz#1365736 --- src/spice-channel.c | 12 ++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(

[Spice-devel] [PATCH v2 spice-gtk 0/2] Handle failed spice authentication

2017-02-19 Thread Snir Sheriber
Hi I dropped for now the idea to send the error num to the client since making it backward compatible without adding capability came out too hackish These patches just split the function and fix the error strings. (separating functions is not a must now, it just seems to me more convenient that

Re: [Spice-devel] Spice protocol behind a Firewall

2017-02-19 Thread Uri Lublin
On 02/19/2017 12:50 PM, Oscar Segarra wrote: Hi Uri, Is there any public documentation for configuring the http/https proxy? In my scenario, I have 2 hypervisors and I don't know exactly how to redirect each port to each hypervisor. And regarding your comments, host_ip and host_port (in first

Re: [Spice-devel] Spice protocol behind a Firewall

2017-02-19 Thread Oscar Segarra
Hi Uri, I have not been able to find the example you suggest... can you paste the url of the example? Thanks a lot. 2017-02-19 18:23 GMT+01:00 Uri Lublin : > On 02/19/2017 12:50 PM, Oscar Segarra wrote: > >> Hi Uri, >> >> Is there any public documentation for configuring the http/https proxy? >