Re: [Spice-devel] allow config download with https

2013-07-25 Thread Marc-André Lureau
Hi! - Mensaje original - > > Besides, is there an easy way to implement a https client using glib only? > > If > > not, is there a small library we can use for that purpose? - any > > suggestions? > > Answering myself, I think libcurl would be a good candidate - see: > > http://curl.haxx

Re: [Spice-devel] allow config download with https

2013-07-25 Thread Dietmar Maurer
> Since it's simply a data fetch from https, why does it needs to be part of > virt- > viewer? > > Can't you write a simple wrapper/script to take care of that? Sure. Then I have to maintain/install a script and remote-viewer, and I want to avoid that. Why is the ovirt code included? I guess

Re: [Spice-devel] allow config download with https

2013-07-25 Thread Marc-André Lureau
hi - Mensaje original - > > Since it's simply a data fetch from https, why does it needs to be part of > > virt- > > viewer? > > > > Can't you write a simple wrapper/script to take care of that? > > Sure. Then I have to maintain/install a script and remote-viewer, and I want > to avoid t

Re: [Spice-devel] allow config download with https

2013-07-25 Thread Dietmar Maurer
> > > Can't you write a simple wrapper/script to take care of that? > > > > Sure. Then I have to maintain/install a script and remote-viewer, and > > I want to avoid that. > > > > Why is the ovirt code included? I guess it is just convenient. > > I haven't used the ovirt support, but my impression

Re: [Spice-devel] porting the virt-viewer onto Android

2013-07-25 Thread i iordanov
Hello! I've cc'd Jojo with whom we discussed at length building aSPICE and succeeded in the end to set up a build environment on his machine. Jojo, please chime in if I forget something. 1) One needs to build a set of libraries which Jojo and I were able to build, but so far haven't found the tim

Re: [Spice-devel] Questions regarding Bug 62033 - Means to detect local-only

2013-07-25 Thread Fedor Lyakhov
I agree about animations, apparently the setting doesn't affect gnome-shell... I'll consider a feature request of something like a setting 'bells-and-whistles', so, when disabled, Gnome accepts that user is serious about disabling all this stuff :) It shouldn't be accessible with dconf-editor thoug