On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 07:46:14PM +0530, RK RK wrote:
> Thanks for your reply Christophe, I am using oVirt 3.6.3 in my production
> environment with 250 Virtual Desktops accessed from within the office
> premises.
>
> Our users will have thin client devices running trimmed down version of
> CentO
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 5:16 PM, RK RK wrote:
> Thanks for your reply Christophe, I am using oVirt 3.6.3 in my production
> environment with 250 Virtual Desktops accessed from within the office
> premises.
>
> Our users will have thin client devices running trimmed down version of
> CentOS 7 with
I have attached the deprecation message screenshot for your reference.
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 7:46 PM, RK RK wrote:
> Thanks for your reply Christophe, I am using oVirt 3.6.3 in my production
> environment with 250 Virtual Desktops accessed from within the office
> premises.
>
> Our users will
Thanks for your reply Christophe, I am using oVirt 3.6.3 in my production
environment with 250 Virtual Desktops accessed from within the office
premises.
Our users will have thin client devices running trimmed down version of
CentOS 7 with spice-xpi installed via yum.
Please let me know if you ne
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:36:21AM +0530, RK RK wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> I have seen in https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Spice
> that xpi-activex (Browser plugins (to be deprecated)).
I cannot find the "to be deprecated" that you mention by looking
at this page, or at the bug list
Hi Team,
I have seen in https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Spice
that xpi-activex (Browser plugins (to be deprecated)).
Does it mean that spice-xpi (Provided via yum in fedora and centos) will be
deprecated and not supported in future releases? If so, then what will be
drop in rep
