Re: [Spice-devel] progress on virt-viewer for windows

2013-09-20 Thread Christophe Fergeau
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 04:48:29PM -0300, Fernando Lozano wrote: > I tried only digest-md5. I guess most people would use either that > or Kerberos. > > Is the "authentication type 1" from the error message a libvirtd > authentication type or a SASL one? It's from libvirt and means SASL auth is n

Re: [Spice-devel] progress on virt-viewer for windows

2013-09-19 Thread Fernando Lozano
Hi, My first tests using virsh from http://teuf.fedorapeople.org/virt-viewer-msi/ were based on the 64-bit (x86_64) binaries. I'll try the 32-bit binaries and report on the results. The 32-bit binaries needed the same DLLs (of course the 32-bit ones) and gave the same results: virsh works with

Re: [Spice-devel] progress on virt-viewer for windows

2013-09-19 Thread Fernando Lozano
Hi Marc, C:\Program Files\VirtViewer\bin>virsh -c qemu+tcp://kvmhost/system error: failed to connect to the hypervisor error: authentication failed: unsupported authentication type 1 It looks like the windows port can't do SASL auth over TCP. So I changed libvirtd.conf to allow unauthenticated c

Re: [Spice-devel] progress on virt-viewer for windows

2013-09-19 Thread Fernando Lozano
Hi, My first tests using virsh from http://teuf.fedorapeople.org/virt-viewer-msi/ were based on the 64-bit (x86_64) binaries. I'll try the 32-bit binaries and report on the results. After having success with a few comands using virsh, I decided to try virt-viewer. It reported missing libss

[Spice-devel] progress on virt-viewer for windows

2013-09-19 Thread Fernando Lozano
Hi Christophe, If someone provides newer windows binaries -- which aren't missing dlls, like the ones at http://teuf.fedorapeople.org/virt-viewer-msi/ -- I will test then. I gave you links to RPMs containing the missing dlls (rpm2cpio foo.dll | cpio -id will unpack them on linux) in https://ww

Re: [Spice-devel] progress on virt-viewer for windows

2013-09-19 Thread Marc-André Lureau
- Original Message - > Hi Christophe, > >> If someone provides newer windows binaries -- which aren't missing > >> dlls, like the ones at http://teuf.fedorapeople.org/virt-viewer-msi/ > >> -- I will test then. > > I gave you links to RPMs containing the missing dlls (rpm2cpio foo.dll > >