> > On 3 Mar 2017, at 13:17, Frediano Ziglio < fzig...@redhat.com > wrote:
>
> > > We have recently discussed the use of the bool type. What about sized int
> >
>
> > > types? What is the policy here?
> >
>
> > > Notably, on a part of the code I’m presently working on, I saw that
> >
>
> >
> On 3 Mar 2017, at 13:17, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
>
>>
>> We have recently discussed the use of the bool type. What about sized int
>> types? What is the policy here?
>>
>> Notably, on a part of the code I’m presently working on, I saw that
>> surface_id could be either an int or an uint32_t.
>
> We have recently discussed the use of the bool type. What about sized int
> types? What is the policy here?
>
> Notably, on a part of the code I’m presently working on, I saw that
> surface_id could be either an int or an uint32_t. There is apparently no
> clear winner:
>
> $ git grep "int.*
We have recently discussed the use of the bool type. What about sized int
types? What is the policy here?
Notably, on a part of the code I’m presently working on, I saw that surface_id
could be either an int or an uint32_t. There is apparently no clear winner:
$ git grep "int.*surface_id" | wc
