Dne 22.7.2011 11:38, Andrea Celestino napsal(a):
Talking about improving streaming video in spice, I am working on a
thesis project about Spice, in particular how it handles streaming
video, only in Linux.
In particular I would like to know if there are possibilities to improve
it by
- replacing
On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 11:38 +0200, Andrea Celestino wrote:
> Talking about improving streaming video in spice, I am working on a
> thesis project about Spice, in particular how it handles streaming
> video, only in Linux.
>
>
> In particular I would like to know if there are possibilities to
> i
Talking about improving streaming video in spice, I am working on a thesis
project about Spice, in particular how it handles streaming video, only in
Linux.
In particular I would like to know if there are possibilities to improve it
by
- replacing mjpeg with another encoder?
- or changing how stre
On 06/28/2011 11:14 AM, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 09:30 +0200, David Jaša wrote:
Dne 28.6.2011 00:39, John A. Sullivan III napsal(a):
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 00:14 +0200, David Jaša wrote:
Dne 27.6.2011 20:45, John A. Sullivan III napsal(a):
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 08:32 +
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 09:30 +0200, David Jaša wrote:
> Dne 28.6.2011 00:39, John A. Sullivan III napsal(a):
> > On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 00:14 +0200, David Jaša wrote:
> >> Dne 27.6.2011 20:45, John A. Sullivan III napsal(a):
> >>> On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 08:32 +0300, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
> Licensing
Dne 28.6.2011 00:39, John A. Sullivan III napsal(a):
> On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 00:14 +0200, David Jaša wrote:
>> Dne 27.6.2011 20:45, John A. Sullivan III napsal(a):
>>> On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 08:32 +0300, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
Licensing and patent concerns of x264 aside (see
http://mailman.vide
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 00:14 +0200, David Jaša wrote:
> Dne 27.6.2011 20:45, John A. Sullivan III napsal(a):
> > On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 08:32 +0300, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
> >> Licensing and patent concerns of x264 aside (see
> >> http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/x264-devel/2010-July/007508.html),
>
Dne 27.6.2011 20:45, John A. Sullivan III napsal(a):
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 08:32 +0300, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
Licensing and patent concerns of x264 aside (see
http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/x264-devel/2010-July/007508.html),
the more I think about it, the more it makes sense to me to have H.2
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 08:32 +0300, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
> Licensing and patent concerns of x264 aside (see
> http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/x264-devel/2010-July/007508.html),
> the more I think about it, the more it makes sense to me to have H.264
> offload feature in QXL:
This sounds great
On 06/27/2011 11:50 AM, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
Hey,
Fwiw,
http://blogs.adobe.com/penguinswf/2010/01/solving_different_problems.html
This is a bit outdated - as they have realized some of the video could
be fully accelerated.
Above: "The Flash Player has to do a little bit more. In addition
Hey,
Fwiw,
http://blogs.adobe.com/penguinswf/2010/01/solving_different_problems.html
and
http://www.splitted-desktop.com/static/en/pdf/actu/Linux_with_Gnash.pdf
might be interesting readings.
Christophe
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 08:32:52AM +0300, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
> Licensing and patent concerns o
Licensing and patent concerns of x264 aside (see
http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/x264-devel/2010-July/007508.html),
the more I think about it, the more it makes sense to me to have H.264
offload feature in QXL:
1. Many (Flash, HTML5, others) are moving to H.264 - and take advantage
of har
Hello, all. Andrea Celestino was kind enough to email me off list about
streaming video performance as reducing SPICE bandwidth consumption for
streaming video is his project as a Computer Engineering student. He
agreed that I could repost our conversation to invite input from others
on the list.
13 matches
Mail list logo
