Re: [Spice-devel] Sound rework 0/0

2013-10-29 Thread Jeremy White
Thanks for works on improve of audio part and Opus support, are there news about this series of patches? I believe kvm forum interrupted Christophe's planned review; hopefully that will happen shortly, now that the forum is over. Cheers, Jeremy ___

Re: [Spice-devel] Sound rework 0/0

2013-10-29 Thread Fabio Fantoni
Il 16/10/2013 20:56, Jeremy White ha scritto: The open issue, in my mind, is whether or not it is worth doing a more complete generalization. That is, the current code has essentially hard coded requirements for the format and number of channels. It also uses fairly static sizing for frame buff

Re: [Spice-devel] Sound rework 0/0

2013-10-16 Thread Jeremy White
> The open issue, in my mind, is whether or not it is worth doing a more > complete generalization. That is, the current code has essentially hard > coded requirements for the format and number of channels. It also uses > fairly static sizing for frame buffers. The spice-gtk code is pretty clean

[Spice-devel] Sound rework 0/0

2013-10-16 Thread Jeremy White
The following three patches are a resend of my first sequence from yesterday that generalizes sound processing. This set should incorporate all of Christophe's feedback. The open issue, in my mind, is whether or not it is worth doing a more complete generalization. That is, the current code has