Regards,
Naga.
From: Lubos Kocman
To:
Cc: spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Sent: Monday, August 8, 2011 1:41 AM
Subject: Re: [Spice-devel] Questions about multimonitor Xinerama configuration
Hi
There is already https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=695323 opened
a
aga.
From: Alon Levy
To: Naga Mohan Pothula
Cc: Leonardo E. Reiter ; Gerd Hoffmann
; "spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
Sent: Friday, August 5, 2011 5:05 AM
Subject: Re: [Spice-devel] Questions about multimonitor Xinerama configuration
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 06:43:58PM -0700,
ter ; Gerd Hoffmann
; "spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
Sent: Friday, August 5, 2011 5:05 AM
Subject: Re: [Spice-devel] Questions about multimonitor Xinerama configuration
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 06:43:58PM -0700, Naga Mohan Pothula wrote:
> Hi Gerd/Alon,
>
> I'm getting t
quot; continuously happens at this scenario.
>
>
> Regards,
> Mohan.
>
>
>
> ________
> From: Leonardo E. Reiter
> To: Gerd Hoffmann
> Cc: spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 1:17 PM
> Subject: Re: [
t;qxl_ring_push" continuously happens at this scenario.
Regards,
Mohan.
From: Leonardo E. Reiter
To: Gerd Hoffmann
Cc: spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 1:17 PM
Subject: Re: [Spice-devel] Questions about multimonitor Xinerama con
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Leonardo E. Reiter
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 4:33 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> you can see the 2nd QXL device at 00:06.0. I don't know why the first
>>> one says "VGA compatible" and the second one doesn't, but hopefully that
>>> is not an
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 4:33 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> you can see the 2nd QXL device at 00:06.0. I don't know why the first
>> one says "VGA compatible" and the second one doesn't, but hopefully that
>> is not an issue.
>>
>
> The second simply isn't matched by the qxl driver due t
Hi,
you can see the 2nd QXL device at 00:06.0. I don't know why the first
one says "VGA compatible" and the second one doesn't, but hopefully that
is not an issue.
The second simply isn't matched by the qxl driver due to the different
PCI class. Fixable (see attachent).
That alone doesn
