On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 11:24:00AM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 22:25 -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 10:49 -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 12:31 +0300, Arnon Gilboa wrote:
> > > > John A. Sullivan III wrote:
On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 12:31 +0300, Arnon Gilboa wrote:
> John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 09:44 +0300, Arnon Gilboa wrote:
> >
> >> Hi John,
> >> See my comments below.
> >> Arnon
> >>
> >> John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello, all. I'm spinning this off of the
John A. Sullivan III wrote:
On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 09:44 +0300, Arnon Gilboa wrote:
Hi John,
See my comments below.
Arnon
John A. Sullivan III wrote:
Hello, all. I'm spinning this off of the "Unfair Comparisons with RDP"
thread as that one is getting a bit long. However, in it, Yaniv
On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 09:44 +0300, Arnon Gilboa wrote:
> Hi John,
> See my comments below.
> Arnon
>
> John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > Hello, all. I'm spinning this off of the "Unfair Comparisons with RDP"
> > thread as that one is getting a bit long. However, in it, Yaniv
> > identified that we
Hi John,
See my comments below.
Arnon
John A. Sullivan III wrote:
Hello, all. I'm spinning this off of the "Unfair Comparisons with RDP"
thread as that one is getting a bit long. However, in it, Yaniv
identified that we were not using vdagent in our Windows guest based
upon the packet traces w
Hello, all. I'm spinning this off of the "Unfair Comparisons with RDP"
thread as that one is getting a bit long. However, in it, Yaniv
identified that we were not using vdagent in our Windows guest based
upon the packet traces we submitted. That sounded plausible as we have
noticed the agent bei
