On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 06:31:18PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Hey there,
>
> I was planning to release spice-gtk v0.22 this week. Since they look
> ready, should I wait for the opus spice-gtk changes to be merged? We
> could also release another version version a bit later anyway.
I'd just
Hey there,
I was planning to release spice-gtk v0.22 this week. Since they look
ready, should I wait for the opus spice-gtk changes to be merged? We
could also release another version version a bit later anyway.
cheers
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Jeremy White wrote:
>> Fwiw, I tested upstr
Fwiw, I tested upstream spice-gtk+remote-viewer against opus
qemu/spice-server and did not observe issues with recording (including when
running in valgrind). Is it only spicec which could be impacted by the
issues you mention? If it is, then I don't think it's really important, I
thought it was a
hey,
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 03:52:17PM -0600, Jeremy White wrote:
> I have not yet, but still intend to, research the corner cases where
> hard coding in the old spicec can fail to record properly.
Fwiw, I tested upstream spice-gtk+remote-viewer against opus
qemu/spice-server and did not observe
The following patch series is take 3 of the Opus support patches.
They test out cleanly for me in playback and record. I particularly
focused on the test case of old qemu, new spice, although I also
affirmed the test case of new spice, old client as well.
This should be different from take 2 as
