On Sun Jan 30 16:22:20 PST 2011 Julian Sikorski wrote:
> OK, it looks like I got it. Taking the fixes from RH bugs 664190 and
> 664192 I built my own libvirt and qemu, which were in the end able to
> start the domain via virsh - this solved the last issue with network.
> This has allowed me to inst
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 01:22:20AM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> W dniu 30.01.2011 23:45, Julian Sikorski pisze:
> > W dniu 30.01.2011 22:39, Alon Levy pisze:
> >> This looks like perfectly normal behavior for a qemu process (sorry,
> >> listened
> >> to h2g2 recently). But it still does. So I'm
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 11:45:31PM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> W dniu 30.01.2011 22:39, Alon Levy pisze:
> > This looks like perfectly normal behavior for a qemu process (sorry,
> > listened
> > to h2g2 recently). But it still does. So I'm going to ask if you can
> > eradicate parts
> > of th
W dniu 30.01.2011 23:45, Julian Sikorski pisze:
> W dniu 30.01.2011 22:39, Alon Levy pisze:
>> This looks like perfectly normal behavior for a qemu process (sorry, listened
>> to h2g2 recently). But it still does. So I'm going to ask if you can
>> eradicate parts
>> of the qemu command line, or be
W dniu 30.01.2011 22:39, Alon Levy pisze:
> This looks like perfectly normal behavior for a qemu process (sorry, listened
> to h2g2 recently). But it still does. So I'm going to ask if you can
> eradicate parts
> of the qemu command line, or better yet do the reverse, start from the minimal
> comm
W dniu 30.01.2011 22:39, Alon Levy pisze:
> This looks like perfectly normal behavior for a qemu process (sorry, listened
> to h2g2 recently). But it still does. So I'm going to ask if you can
> eradicate parts
> of the qemu command line, or better yet do the reverse, start from the minimal
> comm
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 10:29:29PM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> W dniu 30.01.2011 12:11, Alon Levy pisze:
> > On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 06:15:10PM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> >> W dniu 29.01.2011 13:36, Alon Levy pisze:
> >>> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 01:29:13PM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> >
W dniu 30.01.2011 12:11, Alon Levy pisze:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 06:15:10PM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
>> W dniu 29.01.2011 13:36, Alon Levy pisze:
>>> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 01:29:13PM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 29.01.2011 12:50, Alon Levy pisze:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 06:15:10PM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> W dniu 29.01.2011 13:36, Alon Levy pisze:
> > On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 01:29:13PM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> >> W dniu 29.01.2011 12:50, Alon Levy pisze:
> >>> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 12:30:14PM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> >
W dniu 29.01.2011 13:36, Alon Levy pisze:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 01:29:13PM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
>> W dniu 29.01.2011 12:50, Alon Levy pisze:
>>> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 12:30:14PM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 29.01.2011 12:15, Alon Levy pisze:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at
W dniu 29.01.2011 13:36, Alon Levy pisze:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 01:29:13PM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
>> W dniu 29.01.2011 12:50, Alon Levy pisze:
>>> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 12:30:14PM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 29.01.2011 12:15, Alon Levy pisze:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 01:29:13PM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> W dniu 29.01.2011 12:50, Alon Levy pisze:
> > On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 12:30:14PM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> >> W dniu 29.01.2011 12:15, Alon Levy pisze:
> >>> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 12:06:23PM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> >
W dniu 29.01.2011 12:50, Alon Levy pisze:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 12:30:14PM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
>> W dniu 29.01.2011 12:15, Alon Levy pisze:
>>> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 12:06:23PM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 29.01.2011 11:02, Alon Levy pisze:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 12:30:14PM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> W dniu 29.01.2011 12:15, Alon Levy pisze:
> > On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 12:06:23PM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> >> W dniu 29.01.2011 11:02, Alon Levy pisze:
> >>> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 10:56:16AM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> >
W dniu 29.01.2011 12:15, Alon Levy pisze:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 12:06:23PM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
>> W dniu 29.01.2011 11:02, Alon Levy pisze:
>>> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 10:56:16AM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 2011-01-29 10:47, Alon Levy pisze:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 01:15:20PM +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 12:06:23PM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> > W dniu 29.01.2011 11:02, Alon Levy pisze:
> > > On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 10:56:16AM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> > >> W dniu 2011-01-29 10:47, Alon Levy pisze:
> > >>>
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 12:06:23PM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> W dniu 29.01.2011 11:02, Alon Levy pisze:
> > On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 10:56:16AM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> >> W dniu 2011-01-29 10:47, Alon Levy pisze:
> >>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 09:54:37PM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> >
W dniu 29.01.2011 11:02, Alon Levy pisze:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 10:56:16AM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
>> W dniu 2011-01-29 10:47, Alon Levy pisze:
>>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 09:54:37PM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 28.01.2011 21:06, Alon Levy pisze:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 10:56:16AM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> W dniu 2011-01-29 10:47, Alon Levy pisze:
> > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 09:54:37PM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> >> W dniu 28.01.2011 21:06, Alon Levy pisze:
> >>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 08:48:06PM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> >
W dniu 2011-01-29 10:47, Alon Levy pisze:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 09:54:37PM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
>> W dniu 28.01.2011 21:06, Alon Levy pisze:
>>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 08:48:06PM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 28.01.2011 15:32, Alon Levy pisze:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 09:54:37PM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> W dniu 28.01.2011 21:06, Alon Levy pisze:
> > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 08:48:06PM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> >> W dniu 28.01.2011 15:32, Alon Levy pisze:
> >>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:45:07AM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> >
W dniu 28.01.2011 21:06, Alon Levy pisze:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 08:48:06PM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
>> W dniu 28.01.2011 15:32, Alon Levy pisze:
>>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:45:07AM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to try spice on Fedora 14. I have a Win7 Pro 32b
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 08:48:06PM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> W dniu 28.01.2011 15:32, Alon Levy pisze:
> > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:45:07AM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I wanted to try spice on Fedora 14. I have a Win7 Pro 32bit image which
> >> was created with virt man
W dniu 28.01.2011 15:32, Alon Levy pisze:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:45:07AM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I wanted to try spice on Fedora 14. I have a Win7 Pro 32bit image which
>> was created with virt manager. I later added virtio network and drive to
>> it, installing drivers in
O
n Fri, 2011-01-28 at 00:45 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to try spice on Fedora 14. I have a Win7 Pro 32bit image which
> was created with virt manager. I later added virtio network and drive to
> it, installing drivers in the guest as well.
> The problem is that if I try to u
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:45:07AM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to try spice on Fedora 14. I have a Win7 Pro 32bit image which
> was created with virt manager. I later added virtio network and drive to
> it, installing drivers in the guest as well.
> The problem is that if I tr
Hi,
I wanted to try spice on Fedora 14. I have a Win7 Pro 32bit image which
was created with virt manager. I later added virtio network and drive to
it, installing drivers in the guest as well.
The problem is that if I try to use this machine as per F14 wiki, i.e.:
qemu /var/lib/libvirt/images/win
27 matches
Mail list logo