Any chance of getting an updated virt-viewer rpm for f18?
CC
---
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
On 18 Sep 2013 22:28, "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 08:24:26AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> > On 09/18/2013 08:19 AM, Fernando Lozano wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > Can someone from the
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 08:24:26AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 09/18/2013 08:19 AM, Fernando Lozano wrote:
> > Hi,
> Can someone from the Spice community chime in? Why is
> spice-space.org shipping a Fedora 18 build of libvirt (0.10.2.x)
> rather than Fedora 19 (1.0.5.x)? Who does
On 09/18/2013 08:19 AM, Fernando Lozano wrote:
> Hi,
Can someone from the Spice community chime in? Why is
spice-space.org shipping a Fedora 18 build of libvirt (0.10.2.x)
rather than Fedora 19 (1.0.5.x)? Who does the builds, and how often
are they updated?
>>> I do builds when
Hi,
>>> Can someone from the Spice community chime in? Why is
>>> spice-space.org shipping a Fedora 18 build of libvirt (0.10.2.x)
>>> rather than Fedora 19 (1.0.5.x)? Who does the builds, and how often
>>> are they updated?
>> I do builds when releasing new virt-viewer versions, and I use the lat
On 09/18/2013 01:43 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 12:38:03PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>> [adding libvir-list, for some cross-compiling development hints]
>>
>> On 09/17/2013 11:57 AM, Fernando Lozano wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, the libvirt comes grom 0.10.2. I'm running the latest
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 12:38:03PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> [adding libvir-list, for some cross-compiling development hints]
>
> On 09/17/2013 11:57 AM, Fernando Lozano wrote:
>
> > Yes, the libvirt comes grom 0.10.2. I'm running the latest windows
> > binaries provided by spice-space.org:
> >
Hi Christophe,
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 02:57:04PM -0300, Fernando Lozano wrote:
If someone provides newer windows binaries -- which aren't missing
dlls, like the ones at http://teuf.fedorapeople.org/virt-viewer-msi/
-- I will test then.
[...]
Please someone give me newer binaries I can test!
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 02:57:04PM -0300, Fernando Lozano wrote:
> If someone provides newer windows binaries -- which aren't missing
> dlls, like the ones at http://teuf.fedorapeople.org/virt-viewer-msi/
> -- I will test then.
[...]
> Please someone give me newer binaries I can test! ;-)
I gave y
- Original Message -
> [adding libvir-list, for some cross-compiling development hints]
>
> On 09/17/2013 11:57 AM, Fernando Lozano wrote:
>
> > Yes, the libvirt comes grom 0.10.2. I'm running the latest windows
> > binaries provided by spice-space.org:
> >
> > C:\Program Files\VirtVie
[adding libvir-list, for some cross-compiling development hints]
On 09/17/2013 11:57 AM, Fernando Lozano wrote:
> Yes, the libvirt comes grom 0.10.2. I'm running the latest windows
> binaries provided by spice-space.org:
>
> C:\Program Files\VirtViewer\bin>virsh -V
> Virsh command line tool of l
On 09/17/2013 11:27 AM, Fernando Lozano wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Still hoping someone takes my test results and fix the windows port. ;-)
>
> I configured my host to accept remote tcp libvirtd connections, once
> with sasl security and the seccond time without any security. Both
> setups were validated b
Hi Eric,
Hi,
Still hoping someone takes my test results and fix the windows port. ;-)
I configured my host to accept remote tcp libvirtd connections, once
with sasl security and the seccond time without any security. Both
setups were validated by a linux client, who could connect using virsh
an
12 matches
Mail list logo
