On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 07:33:27PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Christophe Fergeau
> wrote:
> > Something that got lost too is the make tag target you had, dunno how much
> > you relied on it...
>
> Automake has various make tags rules. Perhaps it's enough?
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> Something that got lost too is the make tag target you had, dunno how much
> you relied on it...
Automake has various make tags rules. Perhaps it's enough?
--
Marc-André Lureau
___
Spice-dev
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 06:26:02PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> I've pushed this to my usbredir git tree, with 33 small changes:
Great!
>
> 1) LIBUSBREDIRPARSER_SO_VERSION 1:0:0 should be 0:0:0, so that the soname
>does not change by going from Makefiles to autofoo
Ah indeed, I th
Hi,
Thanks,
I've pushed this to my usbredir git tree, with 33 small changes:
1) LIBUSBREDIRPARSER_SO_VERSION 1:0:0 should be 0:0:0, so that the soname
does not change by going from Makefiles to autofoo
2) Drop LIBGPOD_SO_VERSION from configure.ac
3) Make libusb pkgconfig chec
Replace the current build system with an autotools based one.
---
Make.rules | 28
Makefile| 18 ---
Makefile.am |1 +
autogen.sh |4 ++
config
