Hi,
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 09:47:14AM -0500, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> >
> > From: Victor Toso
> >
> > In the current code, output should never be negative but the check
> > exists after we use the variable as index. Make the check earlier.
> >
> > This patch also breaks the check in two in or
>
> From: Victor Toso
>
> In the current code, output should never be negative but the check
> exists after we use the variable as index. Make the check earlier.
>
> This patch also breaks the check in two in order to provide more
> accurate error log.
>
> Found by coverity:
> | check_after_
From: Victor Toso
In the current code, output should never be negative but the check
exists after we use the variable as index. Make the check earlier.
This patch also breaks the check in two in order to provide more
accurate error log.
Found by coverity:
| check_after_sink: You might be usin
