Re: [Spice-devel] [bug spice-gtk] spice-gtk memory leak

2012-05-03 Thread xufango
It does not freed in spice-gtk-0.12. Maybe you have forgotten to merge the code. xufango From: Marc-André Lureau Date: 2012-05-03 00:00 To: xufango CC: Yonit Halperin; Marc-André Lureau; Marian Krcmarik; spice-devel Subject: Re: [Spice-devel] [bug spice-gtk] spice-gtk memory leak Hi On Sat

Re: [Spice-devel] [bug spice-gtk] spice-gtk memory leak

2012-05-02 Thread Marc-André Lureau
Hi On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 8:20 AM, xufango wrote: >   if (NULL != st->out_frame) > free(st->out_frame); What version of spice-gtk are you using? That leak should be fixed since version 0.8 (commit a73f841b59faadccec2c0c410f15149d4a5cb5bb) regards -- Marc-André Lureau

Re: [Spice-devel] [bug spice-gtk] spice-gtk memory leak

2012-04-27 Thread xufango
;timeout != 0) g_source_remove(st->timeout); if (NULL != st->out_frame) free(st->out_frame); free(st); c->streams[id] = NULL; } Thanks! xufango From: Yonit Halperin Date: 2012-03-19 16:43 To: Marc-André Lureau; Marian Krcmarik CC: spice-devel Subject: Re: [Spice-devel

Re: [Spice-devel] [bug spice-gtk] spice-gtk memory leak

2012-03-19 Thread Yonit Halperin
On 03/16/2012 08:13 PM, Marc-André Lureau wrote: - Mensaje original - Also, running spicy under valgrind leak check tool shows quite clearly that there is nothing being leaked directly from spice-gtk, it seems. As I told you off-line, It happened to me that remote-viewer (spice-gtk cl

Re: [Spice-devel] [bug spice-gtk] spice-gtk memory leak

2012-03-16 Thread Marc-André Lureau
- Mensaje original - > > Also, running spicy under valgrind leak check tool shows quite > > clearly > > that there is nothing being leaked directly from spice-gtk, it > > seems. > As I told you off-line, It happened to me that remote-viewer > (spice-gtk client) ended up in 1.3GB, Unfortun

Re: [Spice-devel] [bug spice-gtk] spice-gtk memory leak

2012-03-16 Thread Marian Krcmarik
- Original Message - > From: "Marc-André Lureau" > To: "徐舫" > Cc: "spice-devel" > Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 4:24:50 PM > Subject: Re: [Spice-devel] [bug spice-gtk] spice-gtk memory leak > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:27 AM, 徐舫

Re: [Spice-devel] [bug spice-gtk] spice-gtk memory leak

2012-03-16 Thread xufango
pixman_image_unref will free the image and associated image data. Am I right? xufango From: Marc-André Lureau Date: 2012-03-16 23:24 To: 徐舫 CC: spice-devel Subject: Re: [Spice-devel] [bug spice-gtk] spice-gtk memory leak On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:27 AM, 徐舫 wrote: > But the allocated

Re: [Spice-devel] [bug spice-gtk] spice-gtk memory leak

2012-03-16 Thread 徐舫
pixman_image_unref will free the image and associated image data. Am I right? -- xufango *From:* Marc-André Lureau *Date:* 2012-03-16 23:24 *To:* 徐舫 *CC:* spice-devel *Subject:* Re: [Spice-devel] [bug spice-gtk] spice-gtk memory leak On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:27 A

Re: [Spice-devel] [bug spice-gtk] spice-gtk memory leak

2012-03-16 Thread Marc-André Lureau
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:27 AM, 徐舫 wrote: > But the allocated memory does not free. According to massif, the memory usage becomes stable, but your backtrace is correct, the biggest offender is image cache, which can top 150mb. I am not very familiar with the caching logic, so I can't say whethe

[Spice-devel] [bug spice-gtk] spice-gtk memory leak

2012-03-16 Thread 徐舫
We found that spice-gtk exists serious memory leak problem. The call stack is as follow: ---