On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 05:53:06PM +0100, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> No, the fact is that if I leave the default "auto" option, actually it
> tries the spice-xpi plugin that then fails and not the remote-viewer.
> So I have to manually specify for every VM to use "native".
> Is this expected behavior
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> hey,
>
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 04:39:38PM +0100, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
>> Hope that can get it also on Fedora 19, if the bug referred for 6.x
>> and resolved in 6.5 is this one I found:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=99
hey,
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 04:39:38PM +0100, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> Hope that can get it also on Fedora 19, if the bug referred for 6.x
> and resolved in 6.5 is this one I found:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994613
> should be "only" a matter to port upstram patch to fedora 19
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Tomas Jelinek wrote:
>
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> > @Marc-Andre: do you happen to know what where the win/linux versions where
>> > this support has been added to spice? I did not find it anywhere...
>>
>> checking the NEWS files:
>>
>> spice-gtk v0.15
>
> - Original Message -
> > @Marc-Andre: do you happen to know what where the win/linux versions where
> > this support has been added to spice? I did not find it anywhere...
>
> checking the NEWS files:
>
> spice-gtk v0.15
> virt-viewer v0.5.5
> spice-xpi v2.8.90
Thnx, enriched the w
- Original Message -
> @Marc-Andre: do you happen to know what where the win/linux versions where
> this support has been added to spice? I did not find it anywhere...
checking the NEWS files:
spice-gtk v0.15
virt-viewer v0.5.5
spice-xpi v2.8.90
_
- Original Message -
> From: "Gianluca Cecchi"
> To: "Tomas Jelinek"
> Cc: "Marc-André Lureau" ,
> spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, "users"
> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 12:04:08 AM
> Subject: Re: [Spice-devel] [
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Tomas Jelinek wrote:
>> >> But for sure I tested with an updated Fedora 19 client and if I'm not
>> >> wrong also with a Fedora 20 beta
>> >> And none of them worked...
OK... my expression "for sure" was not the reality ;-)
The problem was that I didn't report
- Original Message -
> From: "Gianluca Cecchi"
> To: "Marc-André Lureau"
> Cc: "Tomas Jelinek" , spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
> "users"
> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 3:09:45 PM
> Subject: Re: [Spice-devel] [Users] S
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
>
> I am not a RHEVM user, I don't know where is the documentation you are
> talking about.
>
Note that my original post was to ovirt-users mailing list. See here for it:
http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2013-December/018735.html
(s
- Original Message -
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> AFAIK this feature is present in windows clients only.
> >>
> >> @SPICE devel:
> >> Is there a plan to add this support also to Linux client
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> Hi,
>>
>> AFAIK this feature is present in windows clients only.
>>
>> @SPICE devel:
>> Is there a plan to add this support also to Linux clients? To what version?
>>
>
> Upstream spice-gtk support
Hi
- Original Message -
> Hi,
>
> AFAIK this feature is present in windows clients only.
>
> @SPICE devel:
> Is there a plan to add this support also to Linux clients? To what version?
>
Upstream spice-gtk supports http proxy for a while.
http proxy support has been added to RHEL 6.5
Hi,
AFAIK this feature is present in windows clients only.
@SPICE devel:
Is there a plan to add this support also to Linux clients? To what version?
thanx,
Tomas
PS: I will update the wiki according to the results from this discussion.
- Original Message -
> From: "Gianluca Cecchi"
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
