On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 08:52:19AM -0400, Alon Levy wrote:
> A second mistake, this was a result of -version-name and not libtool help
> being incorrect. So SONAME is indeed current-age. New question: is
> libspice-server.so.1.3.0 ><= 1.0.2 ?
It should, even though we probably don't care ;)
Chris
- Original Message -
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 02:53:02PM +0300, Alon Levy wrote:
> > > Current bumped and age bumped. Current bumped twice since
> > > previous
> > > values (current = 1, age = 2) were illegal - age must be smaller
> > > or
> > > equ
- Original Message -
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 02:53:02PM +0300, Alon Levy wrote:
> > Current bumped and age bumped. Current bumped twice since previous
> > values (current = 1, age = 2) were illegal - age must be smaller or
> > equal to current, since it's interpreted as meaning our libr
On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 13:01 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 02:53:02PM +0300, Alon Levy wrote:
> > Current bumped and age bumped. Current bumped twice since previous
> > values (current = 1, age = 2) were illegal - age must be smaller or
> > equal to current, since it's i
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 02:53:02PM +0300, Alon Levy wrote:
> Current bumped and age bumped. Current bumped twice since previous
> values (current = 1, age = 2) were illegal - age must be smaller or
> equal to current, since it's interpreted as meaning our library supports
> t interfaces [current, c
Current bumped and age bumped. Current bumped twice since previous
values (current = 1, age = 2) were illegal - age must be smaller or
equal to current, since it's interpreted as meaning our library supports
t interfaces [current, current - age].
New libtool version is thus 3.0.3, since there are
