Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH spice-server v3 00/32] Port SPICE server to Windows

2019-01-31 Thread Frediano Ziglio
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 04:57:47AM -0500, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 03:50:07AM -0500, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 04:23:56AM -0500, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > > > > > > ping > > > > > > > > > > I'd drop the 'socket compatibility la

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH spice-server v3 00/32] Port SPICE server to Windows

2019-01-31 Thread Christophe Fergeau
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 04:57:47AM -0500, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 03:50:07AM -0500, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 04:23:56AM -0500, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > > > > > ping > > > > > > > > I'd drop the 'socket compatibility layer' stuff fro

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH spice-server v3 00/32] Port SPICE server to Windows

2019-01-31 Thread Frediano Ziglio
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 03:50:07AM -0500, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 04:23:56AM -0500, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > > > > ping > > > > > > I'd drop the 'socket compatibility layer' stuff from that series to make > > > it shorter, a 32 patch series with no real world

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH spice-server v3 00/32] Port SPICE server to Windows

2019-01-31 Thread Christophe Fergeau
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 03:50:07AM -0500, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 04:23:56AM -0500, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > > > ping > > > > I'd drop the 'socket compatibility layer' stuff from that series to make > > it shorter, a 32 patch series with no real world use case is ve

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH spice-server v3 00/32] Port SPICE server to Windows

2019-01-31 Thread Frediano Ziglio
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 04:23:56AM -0500, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > > ping > > I'd drop the 'socket compatibility layer' stuff from that series to make > it shorter, a 32 patch series with no real world use case is very low > priority to me. A shorter portability patch series is more likely to

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH spice-server v3 00/32] Port SPICE server to Windows

2019-01-30 Thread Christophe Fergeau
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 04:23:56AM -0500, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > ping I'd drop the 'socket compatibility layer' stuff from that series to make it shorter, a 32 patch series with no real world use case is very low priority to me. A shorter portability patch series is more likely to get a review f

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH spice-server v3 00/32] Port SPICE server to Windows

2019-01-30 Thread Frediano Ziglio
ping > > Windows support is useful to use with Qemu under Windows as host or > to implement servers like Xspice. > Mainly SPICE server uses lot of libraries to expose a TCP protocol. > As TCP is implemented with socket library which is quite portable was > not that hard to port. > Beside some min

[Spice-devel] [PATCH spice-server v3 00/32] Port SPICE server to Windows

2019-01-07 Thread Frediano Ziglio
Windows support is useful to use with Qemu under Windows as host or to implement servers like Xspice. Mainly SPICE server uses lot of libraries to expose a TCP protocol. As TCP is implemented with socket library which is quite portable was not that hard to port. Beside some minor feature (see REAME