>
> On Fri, 2016-11-04 at 07:56 -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > The subject is a bit confusing to me.
> > Looks like is nor a "what" not a "why", just a statement.
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Jonathon Jongsma
> > >
> > > Previously, spicevmc_device_connect() created a channel, which then
>
On Fri, 2016-11-04 at 07:56 -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> The subject is a bit confusing to me.
> Looks like is nor a "what" not a "why", just a statement.
>
> >
> >
> > From: Jonathon Jongsma
> >
> > Previously, spicevmc_device_connect() created a channel, which then
> > internally created
The subject is a bit confusing to me.
Looks like is nor a "what" not a "why", just a statement.
>
> From: Jonathon Jongsma
>
> Previously, spicevmc_device_connect() created a channel, which then
> internally created a device. Then we returned the internal device from
> the channel to the caller
From: Jonathon Jongsma
Previously, spicevmc_device_connect() created a channel, which then
internally created a device. Then we returned the internal device from
the channel to the caller. The channel essentially owned the device, but
it makes more sense for the device to own the channel, because
