On Mon, 2015-10-26 at 15:03 -0500, Jonathon Jongsma wrote:
> While I fully support the effort to reduce unnecessary monitor config
> messages, I have one potential concern about this patch. This patch
> compares the current display configuration to the last sent
> configuration. However, it's theor
While I fully support the effort to reduce unnecessary monitor config
messages, I have one potential concern about this patch. This patch
compares the current display configuration to the last sent
configuration. However, it's theoretically possible that the last sent
configuration may not have bee
When the guest recieves the monitor configuration message, it replies
(through spice-server) by destroying the primary surface, which makes
the SpiceDisplay disabled if its "resize-guest" property is used.
This change of the display state (disabled/enabled) leads to sending
a new monitor config mes
