On Thu, 2018-05-24 at 07:38 -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2018-05-10 at 13:03 -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 2018-05-09 at 14:10 +0100, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > > > > Do not extract all components and compare one by one, can be
> > > > > easily
> > > > > c
>
> On Thu, 2018-05-10 at 13:03 -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2018-05-09 at 14:10 +0100, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > > > Do not extract all components and compare one by one, can be
> > > > easily
> > > > compared together.
> > >
> > > Do you have some data about how performan
On Thu, 2018-05-10 at 13:03 -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2018-05-09 at 14:10 +0100, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > > Do not extract all components and compare one by one, can be
> > > easily
> > > compared together.
> >
> > Do you have some data about how performance compares between
>
> On Wed, 2018-05-09 at 14:10 +0100, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > Do not extract all components and compare one by one, can be easily
> > compared together.
>
> Do you have some data about how performance compares between the two
> implementations? The new implementation clearly looks more effici
On Wed, 2018-05-09 at 14:10 +0100, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> Do not extract all components and compare one by one, can be easily
> compared together.
Do you have some data about how performance compares between the two
implementations? The new implementation clearly looks more efficient,
but the co
Do not extract all components and compare one by one, can be easily
compared together.
Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio
---
common/lz_compress_tmpl.c | 6 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/common/lz_compress_tmpl.c b/common/lz_compress_tmpl.c
index 69e69a6..b778e
