> >
> > On Mon, 2018-03-19 at 10:06 +, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > > This small test prove a that current generated demarshaller code
> > > is not safe to integer overflows leading to buffer overflows.
> > > Actually from a quick look at the protocol it seems that client
> > > can't cause these
>
> On Mon, 2018-03-19 at 10:06 +, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > This small test prove a that current generated demarshaller code
> > is not safe to integer overflows leading to buffer overflows.
> > Actually from a quick look at the protocol it seems that client
> > can't cause these overflows b
On Mon, 2018-03-19 at 10:06 +, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> This small test prove a that current generated demarshaller code
> is not safe to integer overflows leading to buffer overflows.
> Actually from a quick look at the protocol it seems that client
> can't cause these overflows but server can
This small test prove a that current generated demarshaller code
is not safe to integer overflows leading to buffer overflows.
Actually from a quick look at the protocol it seems that client
can't cause these overflows but server can quite easily at
demonstrated by this test.
Signed-off-by: Fredia
