> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 3:04 PM Marc-André Lureau <
> marcandre.lur...@redhat.com > wrote:
> > Hi
>
> > - Original Message -
>
> > > The macro was misused and not doing static check.
>
> > > Spice have other working static check macros to use.
>
> > > The macro is used only by spice
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 3:04 PM Marc-André Lureau <
marcandre.lur...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> - Original Message -
> > The macro was misused and not doing static check.
> > Spice have other working static check macros to use.
> > The macro is used only by spice-common so removing it
> >
Hi
- Original Message -
> The macro was misused and not doing static check.
> Spice have other working static check macros to use.
> The macro is used only by spice-common so removing it
> does not cause issues to other depending projects.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio
ack
(I won
>
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 07:46:07AM -0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 06:26:58AM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I think we should replace SPICE_VERIFY / verify with G_STATIC*
> > > > > > > equival
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 07:46:07AM -0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Hi
>
> - Original Message -
> > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 06:26:58AM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I think we should replace SPICE_VERIFY / verify with G_STATIC*
> > > > > > equivalents.
> > > > > >
Hi
- Original Message -
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 06:26:58AM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I think we should replace SPICE_VERIFY / verify with G_STATIC*
> > > > > equivalents.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > We actually can't for compatibility reason. Some version of GLib
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 06:26:58AM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think we should replace SPICE_VERIFY / verify with G_STATIC*
> > > > equivalents.
> > > >
> > >
> > > We actually can't for compatibility reason. Some version of GLib have
> > > broken macros and we still claim RHE
>
> Hi
>
> - Original Message -
> > >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > > The macro was misused and not doing static check.
> > > > Spice have other working static check macros to use.
> > > > The macro is used only by spice-common so removing it
> > > > does not c
Hi
- Original Message -
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > > The macro was misused and not doing static check.
> > > Spice have other working static check macros to use.
> > > The macro is used only by spice-common so removing it
> > > does not cause issues to other depe
>
> Hi
>
> - Original Message -
> > The macro was misused and not doing static check.
> > Spice have other working static check macros to use.
> > The macro is used only by spice-common so removing it
> > does not cause issues to other depending projects.
> >
>
> See also "[PATCH spice-
Hi
- Original Message -
> The macro was misused and not doing static check.
> Spice have other working static check macros to use.
> The macro is used only by spice-common so removing it
> does not cause issues to other depending projects.
>
See also "[PATCH spice-common 1/4] log: replac
The macro was misused and not doing static check.
Spice have other working static check macros to use.
The macro is used only by spice-common so removing it
does not cause issues to other depending projects.
Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio
---
common/log.h | 5 -
common/quic.c
12 matches
Mail list logo