>
> Can you be a bit more verbose than a simple "ping"? It seems that there
> was some discussion (and at least one ACK) on these patches, so it
> would be useful if you are more explicit about which bits need
> attention.
>
There were some discussion on 1/3 which was acked but the rest
of the s
Can you be a bit more verbose than a simple "ping"? It seems that there
was some discussion (and at least one ACK) on these patches, so it
would be useful if you are more explicit about which bits need
attention.
On Mon, 2018-05-07 at 05:39 -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> ping
>
> >
> > ping
>
ping
>
> ping
>
> >
> > ping
> >
> > >
> > > This fix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501200.
> > >
> > > Frediano Ziglio (3):
> > > Fix integer overflows computing sizes
> > > Write a small test to test possible crash
> > > Avoid integer overflow computing image sizes
> >
ping
>
> ping
>
> >
> > This fix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501200.
> >
> > Frediano Ziglio (3):
> > Fix integer overflows computing sizes
> > Write a small test to test possible crash
> > Avoid integer overflow computing image sizes
> >
> > python_modules/demarshal.p
ping
>
> This fix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501200.
>
> Frediano Ziglio (3):
> Fix integer overflows computing sizes
> Write a small test to test possible crash
> Avoid integer overflow computing image sizes
>
> python_modules/demarshal.py | 52 ++--
This fix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501200.
Frediano Ziglio (3):
Fix integer overflows computing sizes
Write a small test to test possible crash
Avoid integer overflow computing image sizes
python_modules/demarshal.py | 52 ++--
python_modules/mars
