Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH spice] server: Add public spice_qxl_driver_unload method

2013-04-23 Thread Alon Levy
> With a SPICE_DISPLAY_CAP_MONITORS_CONFIG capable client, the client needs to > know what part of the primary to use for each monitor. If the guest driver > does not support this, the server sends messages to the client for a > single monitor spanning the entire primary. > > As soon as the guest

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH spice] server: Add public spice_qxl_driver_unload method

2013-04-23 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 04/23/2013 11:54 AM, Marc-André Lureau wrote: Hi, Thanks for catching this. Have you evaluated clearing the flag in spice_qxl_create_primary_surface_async() ? Yes, but that gets used by multi-head aware drivers too, so that won't work. Regards, Hans _

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH spice] server: Add public spice_qxl_driver_unload method

2013-04-23 Thread Marc-André Lureau
Hi, Thanks for catching this. Have you evaluated clearing the flag in spice_qxl_create_primary_surface_async() ? ___ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel

[Spice-devel] [PATCH spice] server: Add public spice_qxl_driver_unload method

2013-04-23 Thread Hans de Goede
With a SPICE_DISPLAY_CAP_MONITORS_CONFIG capable client, the client needs to know what part of the primary to use for each monitor. If the guest driver does not support this, the server sends messages to the client for a single monitor spanning the entire primary. As soon as the guest calls spice_