On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 03:44:05AM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> OT: I don't fully agree with the reasoning. Today compilers are really
> good inlining single used static functions. Putting even some lines in
> small functions can improve readability if function name is well choosed,
> future mai
>
> From: Marc-André Lureau
>
> red_cursor_marshall_inval(), red_migrate_cursor() and
> on_new_cursor_channel() were short functions that were each only called
> from a single location, so there's no need for them to be separate
> functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathon Jongsma
Acked
OT: I d
From: Marc-André Lureau
red_cursor_marshall_inval(), red_migrate_cursor() and
on_new_cursor_channel() were short functions that were each only called
from a single location, so there's no need for them to be separate
functions.
Signed-off-by: Jonathon Jongsma
---
server/cursor-channel.c | 9 +
