Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH 2/2] Release 0.11.0

2012-06-14 Thread Christophe Fergeau
Hey, On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 03:01:54PM +0300, Alon Levy wrote: > But I thought it doesn't break existing users. If it does that's not > what I meant. I thought the important name was that before the .so, i.e. > libspice-server, and that the dynamic linker will look for .1 and then > if none found

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH 2/2] Release 0.11.0

2012-06-12 Thread Alon Levy
On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 12:32 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 02:23:33PM +0300, Alon Levy wrote: > > Current bumped and age bumped. Current bumped twice since previous > > values (current = 1, age = 2) were illegal - age must be smaller or > > equal to current, since it's i

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH 2/2] Release 0.11.0

2012-06-12 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 02:23:33PM +0300, Alon Levy wrote: > Current bumped and age bumped. Current bumped twice since previous > values (current = 1, age = 2) were illegal - age must be smaller or > equal to current, since it's interpreted as meaning our library supports > t interfaces [current, c

[Spice-devel] [PATCH 2/2] Release 0.11.0

2012-06-12 Thread Alon Levy
Current bumped and age bumped. Current bumped twice since previous values (current = 1, age = 2) were illegal - age must be smaller or equal to current, since it's interpreted as meaning our library supports t interfaces [current, current - age]. New libtool version is thus 3.0.3, since there are