>
> On Fri, 2015-10-30 at 13:23 -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 04:24:27PM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > From: Marc-André Lureau
> > > > >
> > > > > There is no guarantee in the code that this can't be hit, so we
> > > > > should
> > > > >
On Fri, 2015-10-30 at 13:23 -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 04:24:27PM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: Marc-André Lureau
> > > >
> > > > There is no guarantee in the code that this can't be hit, so we
> > > > should
> > > > cope with it (the con
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 04:24:27PM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Marc-André Lureau
> > >
> > > There is no guarantee in the code that this can't be hit, so we should
> > > cope with it (the condition can be reached easily by running the server
> > > without waiting for bl
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 04:24:27PM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> >
> > From: Marc-André Lureau
> >
> > There is no guarantee in the code that this can't be hit, so we should
> > cope with it (the condition can be reached easily by running the server
> > without waiting for blocked clients or p
>
> From: Marc-André Lureau
>
> There is no guarantee in the code that this can't be hit, so we should
> cope with it (the condition can be reached easily by running the server
> without waiting for blocked clients or pipe size)
>
> The following commit will attempt to address this.
> ---
> se
From: Marc-André Lureau
There is no guarantee in the code that this can't be hit, so we should
cope with it (the condition can be reached easily by running the server
without waiting for blocked clients or pipe size)
The following commit will attempt to address this.
---
server/red_worker.c | 3
