>
> HHey,
>
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 10:47:12AM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > >
> > > More Ring cleanup
> >
> > Personally I don't approve the rationale.
> >
> > Rings are used by Qemu and Linux kernel, Qemu calls us directly and
> > we deal with Linux too. Not counting all BSD code. So s
On Fri, 2016-09-09 at 17:03 +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> HHey,
>
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 10:47:12AM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > More Ring cleanup
> >
> > Personally I don't approve the rationale.
> >
> > Rings are used by Qemu and Linux kernel, Qemu calls us di
HHey,
On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 10:47:12AM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> >
> > More Ring cleanup
>
> Personally I don't approve the rationale.
>
> Rings are used by Qemu and Linux kernel, Qemu calls us directly and
> we deal with Linux too. Not counting all BSD code. So surely are not
> less te
>
> More Ring cleanup
Personally I don't approve the rationale.
Rings are used by Qemu and Linux kernel, Qemu calls us directly and
we deal with Linux too. Not counting all BSD code. So surely are not
less tested and maintained then glib code.
Rings are not less readable or less type safe then G
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 11:53:00AM -0500, Jonathon Jongsma wrote:
> More Ring cleanup
> ---
> server/char-device.c | 72
> ++--
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/server/char-device.c b/server/char-device.c
> index
More Ring cleanup
---
server/char-device.c | 72 ++--
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
diff --git a/server/char-device.c b/server/char-device.c
index e01f34c..40512f8 100644
--- a/server/char-device.c
+++ b/server/char-device.c
@@ -
