Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH 07/10] reds: Prepare to make VDIPortState a GObject

2016-04-01 Thread Jonathon Jongsma
On Fri, 2016-04-01 at 16:11 -0500, Jonathon Jongsma wrote: > While we're cleaning things up here, Do we want to keep the VDIPortState name? > The "State" part of it no longer makes as much sense since it doesn't > 'inherit' > from SpiceCharDeviceState anymore. Possibilities: RedCharDeviceVDIPort, >

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH 07/10] reds: Prepare to make VDIPortState a GObject

2016-04-01 Thread Jonathon Jongsma
While we're cleaning things up here, Do we want to keep the VDIPortState name? The "State" part of it no longer makes as much sense since it doesn't 'inherit' from SpiceCharDeviceState anymore. Possibilities: RedCharDeviceVDIPort, RedVDIPort? The rest of the patch is basically mechanical, and look

[Spice-devel] [PATCH 07/10] reds: Prepare to make VDIPortState a GObject

2016-04-01 Thread Jonathon Jongsma
From: Christophe Fergeau This inherits from RedCharDevice. Signed-off-by: Christophe Fergeau Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio --- server/reds.c | 395 +- 1 file changed, 200 insertions(+), 195 deletions(-) diff --git a/server/reds.c b/ser

[Spice-devel] [PATCH 07/10] reds: Prepare to make VDIPortState a GObject

2016-03-30 Thread Frediano Ziglio
From: Christophe Fergeau This inherits from RedCharDevice. Signed-off-by: Christophe Fergeau Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio --- server/reds.c | 383 +- 1 file changed, 194 insertions(+), 189 deletions(-) diff --git a/server/reds.c b/ser