On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 09:48 -0500, Jonathon Jongsma wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 04:38 -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Christophe Fergeau
> > >
> > > There was an extra RedCharDeviceMsgToClientItem type whose only
> > > purpose was to manage a linked list of items to send. GQue
On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 04:38 -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> >
> > From: Christophe Fergeau
> >
> > There was an extra RedCharDeviceMsgToClientItem type whose only
> > purpose was to manage a linked list of items to send. GQueue has the
> > same purpose as this type in addition to being generic.
>
> From: Christophe Fergeau
>
> There was an extra RedCharDeviceMsgToClientItem type whose only
> purpose was to manage a linked list of items to send. GQueue has the
> same purpose as this type in addition to being generic. As the length of
> the send queue is tracked, a GQueue is more appropr
From: Christophe Fergeau
There was an extra RedCharDeviceMsgToClientItem type whose only
purpose was to manage a linked list of items to send. GQueue has the
same purpose as this type in addition to being generic. As the length of
the send queue is tracked, a GQueue is more appropriate than a GLi
