Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH 00/35] new libspice-server API patches.

2010-05-18 Thread Alexander Larsson
On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 20:59 +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > Hi, > > > I reviewed the patches up to 31. Some minor issues were pointed out in > > separate mails, but generally i think this looks good and should go in > > now. > > Yes, I agree on it. Sort the remaining minor bits, then merge. > > >

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH 00/35] new libspice-server API patches.

2010-05-17 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
Hi, I reviewed the patches up to 31. Some minor issues were pointed out in separate mails, but generally i think this looks good and should go in now. Yes, I agree on it. Sort the remaining minor bits, then merge. There are still some old references that we should try to get rid of: vd_i

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH 00/35] new libspice-server API patches.

2010-05-17 Thread Alexander Larsson
On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 13:31 +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > Hi, > > Ok folks, here is what I have right now for review. The first patches > of the patch series has been posted already a while back. Now the > remaining issues have been addressed. Well, almost. Client migration > is not solved yet

[Spice-devel] [PATCH 00/35] new libspice-server API patches.

2010-05-12 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
Hi, Ok folks, here is what I have right now for review. The first patches of the patch series has been posted already a while back. Now the remaining issues have been addressed. Well, almost. Client migration is not solved yet. Most of the patches are pretty straight forward. A more carefu