On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 3:06 AM, Alon Levy wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:30:06PM -0600, Dan McGee wrote:
>
> The title says non-linux, when in fact it's obvious from the rest of
> what you write that the use case is Solaris. Why not say that?
Because these patches should help just as much t
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:30:06PM -0600, Dan McGee wrote:
> This is a set of patches to enable building the server library on a non-Linux,
> non-pure-GNU toolchain platform. The patches range from build system tweaks to
> code changes.
>
I don't have any further problems with this patch series,
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:30:06PM -0600, Dan McGee wrote:
The title says non-linux, when in fact it's obvious from the rest of
what you write that the use case is Solaris. Why not say that?
> This is a set of patches to enable building the server library on a non-Linux,
> non-pure-GNU toolchain
This is a set of patches to enable building the server library on a non-Linux,
non-pure-GNU toolchain platform. The patches range from build system tweaks to
code changes.
Add configure-time check for -Wl,--version-script option
This is a GNU-specific linker option, or at least one not univers
