> On 29 Mar 2018, at 09:14, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 28 Mar 2018, at 18:46, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 06:06:19PM +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
If my task is to "move version check to the agent", do I _have_ to change
the semant
> On 28 Mar 2018, at 18:46, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 06:06:19PM +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
>>> If my task is to "move version check to the agent", do I _have_ to change
>>> the semantics of the version check? No.
>>
>> Of course you have to. There is no “
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 06:06:19PM +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
> > If my task is to "move version check to the agent", do I _have_ to change
> > the semantics of the version check? No.
>
> Of course you have to. There is no “PluginVersionIsCompatible”
> anymore, etc, so the version number
> On 28 Mar 2018, at 17:45, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 10:47:27AM +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
>>> What matters in my opinion is that we decide to break it, once we've
>>> made that decision, the number of commits which are going to make ABI
>>> breaking chang
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 10:47:27AM +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
> > What matters in my opinion is that we decide to break it, once we've
> > made that decision, the number of commits which are going to make ABI
> > breaking changes is less important.
>
> Introducing “subtle” changes such a
> On 27 Mar 2018, at 10:56, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 10:28:24AM +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 27 Mar 2018, at 10:12, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
>>>
>>> With the right patch attached this time.. ;) I've only compile-tested
>>> this as this real
FWIW, personal opinions below :)
On Tue, 2018-03-27 at 10:56 +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 10:28:24AM +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
> >
> >
> > > On 27 Mar 2018, at 10:12, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> > >
> > > With the right patch attached this time.. ;) I'v
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 10:28:24AM +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
>
>
> > On 27 Mar 2018, at 10:12, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> >
> > With the right patch attached this time.. ;) I've only compile-tested
> > this as this really is just a proof of concept at this point.
>
> If I understan
> On 27 Mar 2018, at 10:12, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
>
> With the right patch attached this time.. ;) I've only compile-tested
> this as this really is just a proof of concept at this point.
If I understand correctly, you break the ABI twice, and you rely on a “side
effect” of changing the v
With the right patch attached this time.. ;) I've only compile-tested
this as this really is just a proof of concept at this point.
Christophe
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 06:47:08PM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 11:27:19AM +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
> >
> >
>
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 11:27:19AM +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
>
>
> > On 26 Mar 2018, at 11:25, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> >
> > Hey,
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 01:05:22PM +0100, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
> >> From: Christophe de Dinechin
> >>
> >> Ensure that plugin vers
> On 26 Mar 2018, at 11:25, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 01:05:22PM +0100, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
>> From: Christophe de Dinechin
>>
>> Ensure that plugin version checking cannot be bypassed.
>> Implement version checking without violating the C++ ODR
Hey,
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 01:05:22PM +0100, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
> From: Christophe de Dinechin
>
> Ensure that plugin version checking cannot be bypassed.
> Implement version checking without violating the C++ ODR.
> Improve ABI version numbering when incompatibilites are detected p
From: Christophe de Dinechin
Ensure that plugin version checking cannot be bypassed.
Implement version checking without violating the C++ ODR.
Improve ABI version numbering when incompatibilites are detected post-release.
Add macro to make it easier to generate the ABI interface.
Christophe de D
14 matches
Mail list logo
