Hi Peter,
On 07/16/2012 12:03 PM, Peter Hatina wrote:
Review, please.
Looks good to me, ack.
Uri.
---
SpiceXPI/src/plugin/plugin.cpp | 31 +--
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/SpiceXPI/src/plugin/plugin.cpp b/SpiceXPI/src/plugi
Review, please.
---
SpiceXPI/src/plugin/plugin.cpp | 31 +--
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/SpiceXPI/src/plugin/plugin.cpp b/SpiceXPI/src/plugin/plugin.cpp
index b7f61ba..cb4bc8e 100644
--- a/SpiceXPI/src/plugin/plugin.cpp
+++ b/SpiceX
On 07/12/2012 02:31 PM, Peter Hatina wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/11/2012 02:03 PM, Uri Lublin wrote:
On 07/11/2012 02:03 PM, Peter Hatina wrote:
Hi,
I had a request to validate TCP port values in spice-xpi, so does
this make sense for you?
More info at https://
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/11/2012 02:03 PM, Uri Lublin wrote:
> On 07/11/2012 02:03 PM, Peter Hatina wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I had a request to validate TCP port values in spice-xpi, so does
>> this make sense for you?
>>
>> More info at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug
On 07/11/2012 02:03 PM, Peter Hatina wrote:
Hi,
I had a request to validate TCP port values in spice-xpi, so
does this make sense for you?
More info at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805602
---
SpiceXPI/src/plugin/plugin.cpp | 27 +--
1 file changed, 2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 07/11/2012 01:41 PM, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 01:03:28PM +0200, Peter Hatina wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I had a request to validate TCP port values in spice-xpi, so does
>> this make sense for you?
>
> This sounds like a g
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 01:03:28PM +0200, Peter Hatina wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had a request to validate TCP port values in spice-xpi, so
> does this make sense for you?
>
> More info at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805602
>
> ---
> SpiceXPI/src/plugin/plugin.cpp | 27 ++
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 01:03:28PM +0200, Peter Hatina wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had a request to validate TCP port values in spice-xpi, so
> does this make sense for you?
This sounds like a good thing to do, though spice-xpi is just a gateway
here between ovirt/rhev and remote-viewer, so the validation
Hi,
I had a request to validate TCP port values in spice-xpi, so
does this make sense for you?
More info at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805602
---
SpiceXPI/src/plugin/plugin.cpp | 27 +--
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Sp