On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 03:05:16PM +0200, Peter Hatina wrote:
> of course, it is not. That's why I put there a rhbz link.
We usually try to get bugs fixed upstream first, and then
to backport that to the RHEL package, so having rhbz links in upstream
commits against git master isn't unusual.
If t
Hi,
of course, it is not. That's why I put there a rhbz link.
On 04/09/2013 02:20 PM, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 12:16:38PM +0200, Peter Hatina wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> this should fix
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882339
^^
>>
>> Are we ok with this short
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 12:16:38PM +0200, Peter Hatina wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this should fix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882339
>
> Are we ok with this short diff?
This patch is not against git master if I'm not mistaken (the unlink() are
no longer there, nor the ControllerWaitHelper
Looks good, ack.
On 04/09/2013 12:16 PM, Peter Hatina wrote:
Hi,
this should fix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882339
Are we ok with this short diff?
---
SpiceXPI/src/plugin/plugin.cpp | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/SpiceXPI/src/plugin/plugin.cpp b/Spic
Hi,
this should fix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882339
Are we ok with this short diff?
---
SpiceXPI/src/plugin/plugin.cpp | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/SpiceXPI/src/plugin/plugin.cpp b/SpiceXPI/src/plugin/plugin.cpp
index 4a88e45..d5ca720 100644
--- a/Spi
