Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH] Be explicit about spice-common license

2013-10-23 Thread Jonathon Jongsma
Oops, I even remember telling myself to remember to 'git add' this file, but then I forgot.  Thanks for catching that. On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 4:43 AM, Christophe Fergeau wrote: On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 10:40:33AM -0500, Jonathon Jongsma wrote: Use same license as spice-gtk and spice modules

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH] Be explicit about spice-common license

2013-10-23 Thread Christophe Fergeau
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 10:40:33AM -0500, Jonathon Jongsma wrote: > Use same license as spice-gtk and spice modules (LGPL 2.1) since those > licenses > applied to the spice-common submodule in the past. This makes it more clear > that if you use spice-common separately, the license is still LGPL.

[Spice-devel] [PATCH] Be explicit about spice-common license

2013-10-22 Thread Jonathon Jongsma
Use same license as spice-gtk and spice modules (LGPL 2.1) since those licenses applied to the spice-common submodule in the past. This makes it more clear that if you use spice-common separately, the license is still LGPL. Also mention license and copyright in generated files. --- spice_codegen