Re: [Spice-devel] [[PATCH] [spice-common] 2/2] Add check for openssl

2016-03-31 Thread Christophe Fergeau
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 10:24:53AM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote: > On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 06:00:28PM -0300, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) wrote: > > From: "Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)" > > > > It is required to compile ssl-verify.[ch]. > > Makes sense. Any idea why it could be built without issues so fa

Re: [Spice-devel] [[PATCH] [spice-common] 2/2] Add check for openssl

2016-03-29 Thread Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)
On 03/29/2016 05:24 AM, Christophe Fergeau wrote: > On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 06:00:28PM -0300, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) wrote: >> From: "Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)" >> >> It is required to compile ssl-verify.[ch]. > > Makes sense. Any idea why it could be built without issues so far? Did > you hit some

Re: [Spice-devel] [[PATCH] [spice-common] 2/2] Add check for openssl

2016-03-29 Thread Christophe Fergeau
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 06:00:28PM -0300, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) wrote: > From: "Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)" > > It is required to compile ssl-verify.[ch]. Makes sense. Any idea why it could be built without issues so far? Did you hit some compilation problems which led to this patch? Acked-by: Chr

[Spice-devel] [[PATCH] [spice-common] 2/2] Add check for openssl

2016-03-28 Thread Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)
From: "Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)" It is required to compile ssl-verify.[ch]. Signed-off-by: Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) --- configure.ac | 5 +++-- m4/spice-deps.m4 | 9 + 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index bfdf869..1064bd6 100