> On 28 Mar 2018, at 22:32, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 28 Mar 2018, at 20:46, Jonathon Jongsma wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 2018-03-28 at 17:42 +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
>>> Somewhat OT, but hopefully informative in the context of this thread.
>>>
>>>
On 26 Mar 2018
> On 28 Mar 2018, at 20:46, Jonathon Jongsma wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2018-03-28 at 17:42 +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
>> Somewhat OT, but hopefully informative in the context of this thread.
>>
>>
>>> On 26 Mar 2018, at 18:24, Jonathon Jongsma
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> As teuf mentioned in a di
On Wed, 2018-03-28 at 17:42 +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
> Somewhat OT, but hopefully informative in the context of this thread.
>
>
> > On 26 Mar 2018, at 18:24, Jonathon Jongsma
> > wrote:
> >
> > As teuf mentioned in a different email, std::runtime_error in C++11
> > has a const char
Hi!
Is it possible ro use gstreamer to view or record spice screen session?
___
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 06:06:19PM +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
> > If my task is to "move version check to the agent", do I _have_ to change
> > the semantics of the version check? No.
>
> Of course you have to. There is no “PluginVersionIsCompatible”
> anymore, etc, so the version number
> On 28 Mar 2018, at 17:45, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 10:47:27AM +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
>>> What matters in my opinion is that we decide to break it, once we've
>>> made that decision, the number of commits which are going to make ABI
>>> breaking chang
> On 28 Mar 2018, at 17:20, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 11:10:36AM +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 26 Mar 2018, at 19:06, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 01:05:23PM +0100, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
2. ODR-related
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 10:47:27AM +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
> > What matters in my opinion is that we decide to break it, once we've
> > made that decision, the number of commits which are going to make ABI
> > breaking changes is less important.
>
> Introducing “subtle” changes such a
Somewhat OT, but hopefully informative in the context of this thread.
> On 26 Mar 2018, at 18:24, Jonathon Jongsma wrote:
>
> As teuf mentioned in a different email, std::runtime_error in C++11 has a
> const char* constructor:
Since the presence of this constructor was used repeatedly as an a
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 11:10:36AM +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
>
>
> > On 26 Mar 2018, at 19:06, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 01:05:23PM +0100, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
> >> 2. ODR-related problems
> >>
> >> The C++ One Definition Rule (ODR) states th
> On 28 Mar 2018, at 17:04, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 02:44:56PM +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
>> In my proposal, that message is built in format_message with something like:
>>
>> int written = snprintf(buffer, size, "%s writing %s for file ‘%s'",
>> w
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 02:44:56PM +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
> In my proposal, that message is built in format_message with something like:
>
> int written = snprintf(buffer, size, "%s writing %s for file ‘%s'",
> what(), operation, filename.c_str());
> return append_strerr
> On 28 Mar 2018, at 13:12, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
>
>> Do you have something against requiring string constants in English for our
>> error messages?
>>
>> Is it so difficult to understand that if I have:
>>
>> WriteError(“can’t write”, “header”, filename)
>> WriteError(“can’t
> Do you have something against requiring string constants in English for our
> error messages?
>
> Is it so difficult to understand that if I have:
>
> WriteError(“can’t write”, “header”, filename)
> WriteError(“can’t write”, “boson”, filename)
>
> I can localize all the combinatio
> On 26 Mar 2018, at 18:24, Jonathon Jongsma wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2018-03-26 at 12:36 +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
>> I realize I had left this one unanswered.
>>
>>> On 7 Mar 2018, at 15:14, Jonathon Jongsma
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 12:34 +0100, Christophe de Dinechin
> On 26 Mar 2018, at 19:06, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 01:05:23PM +0100, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
>> 2. ODR-related problems
>>
>> The C++ One Definition Rule (ODR) states that all translation units
>> must see the same definitions. In the current code, when we
> On 27 Mar 2018, at 10:56, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 10:28:24AM +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 27 Mar 2018, at 10:12, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
>>>
>>> With the right patch attached this time.. ;) I've only compile-tested
>>> this as this real
Following Eduardo’s sharing of his branch using Meson to build SPICE
(https://gitlab.com/etrunko/spice/tree/meson), I ran some comparisons with the
make-only build system I proposed late last year
(https://github.com/c3d/spice/tree/c3d-build).
First, in case you want to reproduce, a bit of warn
18 matches
Mail list logo
