Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH spice-server v2 00/23] Use GLib memory allocation

2017-09-21 Thread Jonathon Jongsma
On Thu, 2017-09-21 at 08:58 -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > I think this is a matter of style and as such just different > opinions. > > Considering the current mixed style I would proposed a poll. > > I obviously vote for moving to GLib functions directly. This is my vote as well (which is mayb

Re: [Spice-devel] [spice-server v2] tests: Automatically determine free port to use

2017-09-21 Thread Christophe Fergeau
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 11:11:03AM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > > > > Currently, the port used by most tests is hardcoded to 5912. However, > > the test suite can be run in parallel, so if 2 tests run in parallel, > > the 2nd one is not going to be able to bind to port 5912 and will fail. > >

Re: [Spice-devel] [spice-server v2] tests: Automatically determine free port to use

2017-09-21 Thread Frediano Ziglio
> > Currently, the port used by most tests is hardcoded to 5912. However, > the test suite can be run in parallel, so if 2 tests run in parallel, > the 2nd one is not going to be able to bind to port 5912 and will fail. > > After this commit, test_new() will try to find a free port between 5912 >

[Spice-devel] [spice-server v2] tests: Automatically determine free port to use

2017-09-21 Thread Christophe Fergeau
Currently, the port used by most tests is hardcoded to 5912. However, the test suite can be run in parallel, so if 2 tests run in parallel, the 2nd one is not going to be able to bind to port 5912 and will fail. After this commit, test_new() will try to find a free port between 5912 and 5922 and w

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH spice-server v2 00/23] Use GLib memory allocation

2017-09-21 Thread Christophe de Dinechin
> On 21 Sep 2017, at 14:58, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > >>> >>> On 20 Sep 2017, at 18:27, Christophe Fergeau wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 06:15:49PM +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote: > On 20 Sep 2017, at 17:51, Christophe Fergeau wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 20,

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH spice-server v2 00/23] Use GLib memory allocation

2017-09-21 Thread Christophe Fergeau
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 08:58:04AM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > I obviously vote for moving to GLib functions directly. Regarding the amount of changes this means, and potential extra-rebasing work, one possible way of integrating these changes would be to only switch to glib a function or a fi

Re: [Spice-devel] spice-server 0.14 release plans

2017-09-21 Thread Christophe Fergeau
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 09:18:39AM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 09:12:10AM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > > > > > > > > Hey, > > > > > > > > I really want to get a 0.14.0 release out of the door soon, but the > > > > amount of patches going in spice-server latel

Re: [Spice-devel] [spice-server] tests: Automatically determine free port to use

2017-09-21 Thread Christophe Fergeau
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 09:36:25AM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > > > > Currently, the port used by most tests is hardcoded to 5912. However, > > the test suite can be run in parallel, so if 2 tests run in parallel, > > the 2nd one is not going to be able to bind to port 5912 and will fail. > >

Re: [Spice-devel] [spice-server] tests: Automatically determine free port to use

2017-09-21 Thread Frediano Ziglio
> > Currently, the port used by most tests is hardcoded to 5912. However, > the test suite can be run in parallel, so if 2 tests run in parallel, > the 2nd one is not going to be able to bind to port 5912 and will fail. > > After this commit, test_new() will try to find a free port between 5912 >

Re: [Spice-devel] spice-server 0.14 release plans

2017-09-21 Thread Frediano Ziglio
> > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 09:12:10AM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > > > > > > Hey, > > > > > > I really want to get a 0.14.0 release out of the door soon, but the > > > amount of patches going in spice-server lately is not making me feel > > > very comfortable with cutting a release at an arb

Re: [Spice-devel] spice-server 0.14 release plans

2017-09-21 Thread Christophe Fergeau
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 09:12:10AM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > > > > Hey, > > > > I really want to get a 0.14.0 release out of the door soon, but the > > amount of patches going in spice-server lately is not making me feel > > very comfortable with cutting a release at an arbitary time. > >

Re: [Spice-devel] spice-server 0.14 release plans

2017-09-21 Thread Frediano Ziglio
> > Hey, > > I really want to get a 0.14.0 release out of the door soon, but the > amount of patches going in spice-server lately is not making me feel > very comfortable with cutting a release at an arbitary time. > > What I would like to do: > - slow down on the amount of patches going in for

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH spice-server v2 00/23] Use GLib memory allocation

2017-09-21 Thread Frediano Ziglio
> > > On 20 Sep 2017, at 18:27, Christophe Fergeau wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 06:15:49PM +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote: > >> > >> > >>> On 20 Sep 2017, at 17:51, Christophe Fergeau wrote: > >>> > >>> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 05:31:37PM +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote: >

[Spice-devel] [spice-server] build: Prepare for 0.13.91 release

2017-09-21 Thread Christophe Fergeau
--- NEWS | 15 +++ configure.ac | 2 +- 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS index 784747e3f..3f715d2f6 100644 --- a/NEWS +++ b/NEWS @@ -1,3 +1,18 @@ +Major Changes in 0.13.91: += + +*** IMPORTANT *** +0.13.91 is th

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH spice-server v2 00/23] Use GLib memory allocation

2017-09-21 Thread Christophe de Dinechin
> On 20 Sep 2017, at 18:27, Christophe Fergeau wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 06:15:49PM +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote: >> >> >>> On 20 Sep 2017, at 17:51, Christophe Fergeau wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 05:31:37PM +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote: > O