Re: [Spice-devel] snappy name conflict

2013-04-05 Thread Liang Guo
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 5:48 AM, Dominique Rodrigues < dominique.rodrig...@nanocloud.com> wrote: > I am used to compile it. However, thats true that we have it in debian > repos : > > # apt-cache search snappy > libleveldb1 - fast key-value storage library > python-snappy - Python library for the s

Re: [Spice-devel] snappy name conflict

2013-04-05 Thread Dominique Rodrigues
As a Debian user, I did not know that spice-gtk was called snappy in Fedora ... For me it was and is simply : spicy On Fri, 5 Apr 2013 15:27:41 -0400, Luis de Bethencourt wrote: That is fantastic! Way sooner than I expected. Great timing :) Thanks, Luis On 5 April 2013 15:19, Marc-And

Re: [Spice-devel] snappy name conflict

2013-04-05 Thread Dominique Rodrigues
I am used to compile it. However, thats true that we have it in debian repos : # apt-cache search snappy libleveldb1 - fast key-value storage library python-snappy - Python library for the snappy compression library from Google libsnappy-dev - fast compression/decompression library (development

Re: [Spice-devel] snappy name conflict

2013-04-05 Thread Dominique Rodrigues
Yes, here are the differences : # aptitude show spice-client-gtk ... Description : Simple clients for interacting with SPICE servers Simple clients for interacting with SPICE servers. This package includes: spicy - GTK+ based SPICE client tool SNAPPY - SPICE SCREEN-SHOT CAPTURE TOOL sp

Re: [Spice-devel] snappy name conflict

2013-04-05 Thread Luis de Bethencourt
Dominique, I think spice-gtk's spicy and snappy are different things. I'm sure somebody in this mailing list can explain the differences. Luis On 5 April 2013 17:44, Dominique Rodrigues < dominique.rodrig...@nanocloud.com> wrote: > As a Debian user, I did not know that spice-gtk was called sna

[Spice-devel] [PATCH spice-gtk] cairo: fix reference leak

2013-04-05 Thread Marc-André Lureau
cairo_surface_finish() doesn't remove the reference, cairo_surface_destroy() does and will call surface_finish(). Thanks to Uli Schlachter for noticing that in: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61876 --- gtk/spice-widget-cairo.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) d

Re: [Spice-devel] snappy name conflict

2013-04-05 Thread Luis de Bethencourt
That is fantastic! Way sooner than I expected. Great timing :) Thanks, Luis On 5 April 2013 15:19, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > Hi > > - Mensaje original - > > Thanks Marc-Andre :) > > > > I do think this is the best solution. Less intrusive for linux desktop > users. > > > > When is the

Re: [Spice-devel] snappy name conflict

2013-04-05 Thread Marc-André Lureau
Hi - Mensaje original - > Thanks Marc-Andre :) > > I do think this is the best solution. Less intrusive for linux desktop users. > > When is the next release of spice-gtk planned to happen? Soonish, probably next week or so. Is that ok? ___ S

Re: [Spice-devel] snappy name conflict

2013-04-05 Thread Luis de Bethencourt
Thanks Marc-Andre :) I do think this is the best solution. Less intrusive for linux desktop users. When is the next release of spice-gtk planned to happen? Regards, Luis On 5 April 2013 15:08, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > Hi! > > On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Luis de Bethencourt < > l...@deb

Re: [Spice-devel] snappy name conflict

2013-04-05 Thread Marc-André Lureau
Hi! On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Luis de Bethencourt wrote: > Hello everybody :) > > After 2 years of slow development snappy 0.3 is out, and it has picked up > the interest of the Fedora packagers. The problem is that the snappy > executable name conflicts with spice-gtk. > > In Fedora /usr/b

[Spice-devel] snappy name conflict

2013-04-05 Thread Luis de Bethencourt
Hello everybody :) After 2 years of slow development snappy 0.3 is out, and it has picked up the interest of the Fedora packagers. The problem is that the snappy executable name conflicts with spice-gtk. In Fedora /usr/bin/snappy is owned by spice-gtk in debian/gentoo /usr/bin/snappy is owned by

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH spice] snd_worker: Don't send empty audio-volume messages

2013-04-05 Thread Yonit Halperin
Ack On 04/05/2013 09:55 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: If no volume has been set it, we end up sending a volume message with audio-volume for 0 channels (iow an empty message). This is not useful and triggers the following warning in spice-gtk: (remote-viewer:8726): GSpice-WARNING **: set_sink_input_

[Spice-devel] [PATCH spice] snd_worker: Don't send empty audio-volume messages

2013-04-05 Thread Hans de Goede
If no volume has been set it, we end up sending a volume message with audio-volume for 0 channels (iow an empty message). This is not useful and triggers the following warning in spice-gtk: (remote-viewer:8726): GSpice-WARNING **: set_sink_input_volume() failed: Invalid argument Signed-off-by: Ha

[Spice-devel] [PATCH spice 0/1] snd_worker: Don't send empty audio-volume messages

2013-04-05 Thread Hans de Goede
Resend, please review! Regards, Hans ___ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel