Re: [Spice-devel] A sever bug found in 64-bit WIndows 7 VM

2012-05-28 Thread Charles . Tsai-蔡清海-研究發展部
I disabled power saving mode. Will check if it is the root cause. I did try to remove qxl driver and the VM could run without crash. From: wangfeng wangfeng [mailto:wangfeng.v1.1...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2012 12:07 PM To: Charles.Tsai-蔡清海-研究發展部 Cc: spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; J

Re: [Spice-devel] A sever bug found in 64-bit WIndows 7 VM

2012-05-28 Thread wangfeng wangfeng
Hi, I have encountered the same situation . 2012/5/29 Charles.Tsai-蔡清海-研究�l展部 > Bug description: > > A sever bug was found on 64-bit Windows 7 VM which crashed after running > idle for a while(~ 2-3 hours). > > When we checked the kvm process, it was killed from the system. > > **

Re: [Spice-devel] A sever bug found in 64-bit WIndows 7 VM

2012-05-28 Thread Charles . Tsai-蔡清海-研究發展部
Thank you for your prompt reply. We will double check power option. Are you saying that VM must turn off power saving mode? -Original Message- From: Andrew Cathrow [mailto:acath...@redhat.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2012 11:13 AM To: Charles.Tsai-蔡清海-研究發展部 Cc: Jonah.Wu-吳君勉-研究發展部; spice-d

Re: [Spice-devel] A sever bug found in 64-bit WIndows 7 VM

2012-05-28 Thread Andrew Cathrow
- Original Message - > From: "Charles.Tsai-蔡清海-研究發展部" > To: spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: "Jonah.Wu-吳君勉-研究發展部" > Sent: Monday, May 28, 2012 10:58:19 PM > Subject: [Spice-devel] A sever bug found in 64-bit WIndows 7 VM > > > > > > Bug description: > > A sever bug was foun

[Spice-devel] A sever bug found in 64-bit WIndows 7 VM

2012-05-28 Thread Charles . Tsai-蔡清海-研究發展部
Bug description: A sever bug was found on 64-bit Windows 7 VM which crashed after running idle for a while(~ 2-3 hours). When we checked the kvm process, it was killed from the system. Drivers installed: Qxl, Virtioserail Vdagent Qemu & Spice:

Re: [Spice-devel] Two Clients

2012-05-28 Thread wangfeng wangfeng
Oh ,I see it now. Thank you! 2012/5/28 Alon Levy > On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 07:59:12PM +0800, wangfeng wangfeng wrote: > > Hi, > > Thank you for your reply. > > But what does "client reach a full pipe condition" refers to? Maybe I > have > > something not understand. > > Spice server has a linke

Re: [Spice-devel] xf86-video-qxl performance

2012-05-28 Thread John A. Sullivan III
On Mon, 2012-05-28 at 12:59 +0300, Alon Levy wrote: > On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 11:29:23AM +0200, Attila Sukosd wrote: > > Low latency (and relatively low bandwidth) video streaming can be done with > > x264 and xvid (low enough for a 3d game to be playable over the net) > > However, it introduces li

Re: [Spice-devel] xf86-video-qxl performance

2012-05-28 Thread John A. Sullivan III
On Mon, 2012-05-28 at 12:59 +0300, Alon Levy wrote: > On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 11:29:23AM +0200, Attila Sukosd wrote: > > Low latency (and relatively low bandwidth) video streaming can be done with > > x264 and xvid (low enough for a 3d game to be playable over the net) > > However, it introduces li

Re: [Spice-devel] xf86-video-qxl performance

2012-05-28 Thread Alon Levy
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 12:19:57PM +0300, Alon Levy wrote: > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 01:24:05PM -0500, Jeremy White wrote: > > > Actually, for WAN, we require ACK for 40 messages, but we allow sending > > > up to 80, without getting an ack for the first 40. > > > From my experience with Windows gue

Re: [Spice-devel] xf86-video-qxl performance

2012-05-28 Thread Jeremy White
>> Is that todo on anyone’s immediate radar? I'm certainly not qualified, >> but it seems like that could have an major impact on what we're trying >> to achieve (regular Office applications hosted on a pure Linux server >> across a WAN). So perhaps I need to become qualified :-/. > > I have a p

Re: [Spice-devel] Two Clients

2012-05-28 Thread Alon Levy
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 07:59:12PM +0800, wangfeng wangfeng wrote: > Hi, > Thank you for your reply. > But what does "client reach a full pipe condition" refers to? Maybe I have > something not understand. Spice server has a linked list of messages waiting to be sent for each client, called the p

Re: [Spice-devel] Two Clients

2012-05-28 Thread wangfeng wangfeng
Hi, Thank you for your reply. But what does "client reach a full pipe condition" refers to? Maybe I have something not understand. 2012/5/28 Alon Levy > On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 02:58:34PM +0800, wangfeng wangfeng wrote: > > Try the following command: > > export SPICE_DEBUG_ALLOW_MC=1 > > But pl

Re: [Spice-devel] xf86-video-qxl performance

2012-05-28 Thread Alon Levy
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 11:29:23AM +0200, Attila Sukosd wrote: > Low latency (and relatively low bandwidth) video streaming can be done with > x264 and xvid (low enough for a 3d game to be playable over the net) > However, it introduces licensing issues and high-ish CPU usage on the host > side :(

Re: [Spice-devel] Two Clients

2012-05-28 Thread Alon Levy
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 02:58:34PM +0800, wangfeng wangfeng wrote: > Try the following command: > export SPICE_DEBUG_ALLOW_MC=1 But please be aware that this will (given enough time) crash the server if any of the clients reach a full pipe condition. > > > > 2012/5/25 蒋媛园 > > > Hi~ > >I

Re: [Spice-devel] xf86-video-qxl performance

2012-05-28 Thread Attila Sukosd
Low latency (and relatively low bandwidth) video streaming can be done with x264 and xvid (low enough for a 3d game to be playable over the net) However, it introduces licensing issues and high-ish CPU usage on the host side :( On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Alon Levy wrote: > On Thu, May 24

Re: [Spice-devel] xf86-video-qxl performance

2012-05-28 Thread Alon Levy
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 09:07:43AM +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote: > On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 15:20 -0500, Jeremy White wrote: > > > Also, as a crazy idea, has anyone considered implementing a pure > > streaming video driver? That is, what if we had a frame buffer driver, > > and then a thread that

Re: [Spice-devel] [usbredir v2 PATCH] support building usbredir for Windows with mingw

2012-05-28 Thread Uri Lublin
On 05/28/2012 11:29 AM, Uri Lublin wrote: On 05/24/2012 05:59 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 05/24/2012 04:40 PM, Uri Lublin wrote: Out of v1 patch-set, all patches but one (patch 6) got acked. This patch-set contains a single patch, which is another solution for strtok_r missing in mingw. I

Re: [Spice-devel] xf86-video-qxl performance

2012-05-28 Thread Alon Levy
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 01:24:05PM -0500, Jeremy White wrote: > > Actually, for WAN, we require ACK for 40 messages, but we allow sending > > up to 80, without getting an ack for the first 40. > > From my experience with Windows guest, it sounds like the DRAW_FILL > > commands might be related to a

Re: [Spice-devel] [protocol RFC 0/2] RANDR support via QXLHead + SpiceHead

2012-05-28 Thread Alon Levy
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 09:23:13AM +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote: > On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 09:28 +0300, Alon Levy wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Currently we support multiple monitors by having: > > single pci = single display channel = single client window > > > > The RANDR architecture doesn't len

Re: [Spice-devel] [usbredir v2 PATCH] usbredirfilter: Win32: implement strtok_r to be used by windows (win_strtok_r)

2012-05-28 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 05/24/2012 04:40 PM, Uri Lublin wrote: mingw imlpements neigther strtok_r nor strtok_s. So here is a simple implementation of strtok_r (for windows). It assumes the delimiter is a single character, which is good enough for usbredirfilter. If we're going to do this I would prefer to do

Re: [Spice-devel] [usbredir v2 PATCH] support building usbredir for Windows with mingw

2012-05-28 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 05/28/2012 10:29 AM, Uri Lublin wrote: On 05/24/2012 05:59 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 05/24/2012 04:40 PM, Uri Lublin wrote: Out of v1 patch-set, all patches but one (patch 6) got acked. This patch-set contains a single patch, which is another solution for strtok_r missing in min

Re: [Spice-devel] [usbredir v2 PATCH] support building usbredir for Windows with mingw

2012-05-28 Thread Uri Lublin
On 05/24/2012 05:59 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 05/24/2012 04:40 PM, Uri Lublin wrote: Out of v1 patch-set, all patches but one (patch 6) got acked. This patch-set contains a single patch, which is another solution for strtok_r missing in mingw. It's a simple implementation of strtok_r. A

Re: [Spice-devel] [spice-gtk Win32 v2 PATCH 3/5] Windows mingw: usb: add win-usb-dev.[ch]: implement GUdevDevice & GUdevClient

2012-05-28 Thread Arnon Gilboa
Hi Thanks for the helpful comments. See below. Marc-André Lureau wrote: Hi +WIN_USB_FILES= \ + win-usb-dev.h \ + win-usb-dev.c \ + usbclerk.h \ + $(NULL) + +if OS_WIN32 +libspice_client_glib_2_0_la_SOURCES += \

Re: [Spice-devel] [spice-gtk Win32 v2 PATCH 3/5] Windows mingw: usb: add win-usb-dev.[ch]: implement GUdevDevice & GUdevClient

2012-05-28 Thread Arnon Gilboa
I am working on removal of all libusb dependency in win-usb-dev, which cleanups this mess. Hans de Goede wrote: diff --git a/gtk/win-usb-dev.c b/gtk/win-usb-dev.c new file mode 100644 index 000..7503c41 --- /dev/null +++ b/gtk/win-usb-dev.c +rc = libusb_init(NULL); +g_return_va