Hello,
My name is Aric Stewart. Primarily a WINE hacker, due to interest
from a client I am starting work on spice. I will mostly be focusing on
the win32 client to begin with but we will see where work progresses.
I am happy to be helping out here and hope to be able to be productive.
This patch completes the copy from
4d8f39020ac83602c1647d4af04e8b19bf74ed6e which missed this file.
---
client/windows/getopt.h | 56
+++
1 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 client/windows/getopt.h
diff --git a
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 09:07:22PM +0200, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Did you forgot about your patches?
> Should I take care of doing the small change in 6/12 and push for you?
Oh I didn't notice they were ACKd. Feel free to push them, otherwise I'll
try todo it sometime tomorrow
Hi Daniel,
Did you forgot about your patches?
Should I take care of doing the small change in 6/12 and push for you?
cheers
--
Marc-André Lureau
___
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listin
the python script is now in spice-common and client_marshallers.h needs
to be included instead of marshallers.h
---
client/windows/generate.bat |4 ++--
client/windows/generate1.bat |4 ++--
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/client/windows/generate.bat b/
---
common/gdi_canvas.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/common/gdi_canvas.c b/common/gdi_canvas.c
index 4c5daea..0a04bf8 100644
--- a/common/gdi_canvas.c
+++ b/common/gdi_canvas.c
@@ -564,7 +564,7 @@ static uint8_t *create_bitmap(HBITMAP *bitmap, HBITMAP
Hi,
On 04/16/2012 02:43 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
Looks like both the BAR and it's backing region were initialized to 4k.
The number 4096 does show up in the patch, probably it sneaked into the
BAR somehow.
Yea, one page is the minimum size, that shouldn't have been the default
though.
On 04/16/2012 03:43 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> > Looks like both the BAR and it's backing region were initialized to 4k.
>> > The number 4096 does show up in the patch, probably it sneaked into the
>> > BAR somehow.
> Yea, one page is the minimum size, that shouldn't have been the defau
Hi,
> Looks like both the BAR and it's backing region were initialized to 4k.
> The number 4096 does show up in the patch, probably it sneaked into the
> BAR somehow.
Yea, one page is the minimum size, that shouldn't have been the default
though. Alon has a fix for it (attached), still in the
On 04/16/2012 12:39 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On 04/06/12 15:54, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > Hi Gerd,
> >
> > While cherry picking some spice patches into my own qemu-kvm-1.0 branch,
> > so that we can add them to Fedora-17 I noticed a significant slowdown
> > after I was done cherry picking. Invest
On 04/16/2012 03:02 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>
> Could it be that the patch somehow causes seabios and/or Xorg to
> see the region as different wrt being cachable / uncachable or
> some such?
In general we ignore cacheability in kvm. Most likely a but in the
memory core caused the region to be in
Hi,
On 04/16/2012 11:59 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 04/16/2012 12:39 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On 04/06/12 15:54, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi Gerd,
While cherry picking some spice patches into my own qemu-kvm-1.0 branch,
so that we can add them to Fedora-17 I noticed a significant slowdown
after I wa
On 04/16/2012 12:39 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On 04/06/12 15:54, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > Hi Gerd,
> >
> > While cherry picking some spice patches into my own qemu-kvm-1.0 branch,
> > so that we can add them to Fedora-17 I noticed a significant slowdown
> > after I was done cherry picking. Invest
Hi,
On 04/16/2012 11:39 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On 04/06/12 15:54, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi Gerd,
While cherry picking some spice patches into my own qemu-kvm-1.0 branch,
so that we can add them to Fedora-17 I noticed a significant slowdown
after I was done cherry picking. Investigation has sh
On 04/06/12 15:54, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi Gerd,
>
> While cherry picking some spice patches into my own qemu-kvm-1.0 branch,
> so that we can add them to Fedora-17 I noticed a significant slowdown
> after I was done cherry picking. Investigation has shown your
> "qxl: add optinal 64bit vram bar
On 04/06/12 15:54, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi Gerd,
>
> While cherry picking some spice patches into my own qemu-kvm-1.0 branch,
> so that we can add them to Fedora-17 I noticed a significant slowdown
> after I was done cherry picking. Investigation has shown your
> "qxl: add optinal 64bit vram bar
Christophe Fergeau wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 12:24:38PM +0300, Arnon Gilboa wrote:
will be nice to keep latest x86 & x64 wspice zips on the new dl page.
otherwise, no way to run the legacy spicec on windows.
These would be
http://spice-space.org/download/stable/wspice-x86_201
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 12:24:38PM +0300, Arnon Gilboa wrote:
> will be nice to keep latest x86 & x64 wspice zips on the new dl page.
> otherwise, no way to run the legacy spicec on windows.
These would be
http://spice-space.org/download/stable/wspice-x86_20110308.zip and
http://spice-space.o
18 matches
Mail list logo
