Re: [Spice-devel] Spice Testing

2011-10-23 Thread Swapna
Hi, Spice Testing is currently performed by the Spice QE team and they are at present manual. They are in the process of automating their tests. On 10/23/2011 12:27 PM, Mizon Tsai wrote: Hi All, I am hoping to get an idea of the current state of Tests in Spice, so that I can gauge on an are

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH v2] [0.8 branch] server: add main_dispatcher

2011-10-23 Thread Alon Levy
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 07:01:36PM +0200, Alon Levy wrote: self NACK, missed part of the patch. > add main_dispatcher, a message passing mechanism for sending messages to > the main thread. The main thread is the thread that implements > SpiceCoreInterface, which is assumed to be a single thread.

[Spice-devel] [PATCH v3] [0.8 branch] server: add main_dispatcher

2011-10-23 Thread Alon Levy
add main_dispatcher, a message passing mechanism for sending messages to the main thread. The main thread is the thread that implements SpiceCoreInterface, which is assumed to be a single thread. Similar to the async operation of red_worker, a socket pair is created and used to pass messages. The

[Spice-devel] [PATCH v2] [0.8 branch] server: add main_dispatcher

2011-10-23 Thread Alon Levy
add main_dispatcher, a message passing mechanism for sending messages to the main thread. The main thread is the thread that implements SpiceCoreInterface, which is assumed to be a single thread. Similar to the async operation of red_worker, a socket pair is created and used to pass messages. The

Re: [Spice-devel] Possible SPICE/QEMU deadlock on fast client reconnect

2011-10-23 Thread Alon Levy
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 09:37:59AM +0200, Yonit Halperin wrote: > Hi, > > Sounds like https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746950 and > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41858 > Alon's patch: > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/spice-devel/2011-September > /005369.html > Shou

[Spice-devel] Spice Testing

2011-10-23 Thread Mizon Tsai
Hi All, I am hoping to get an idea of the current state of Tests in Spice, so that I can gauge on an area where I can help for tests. The questions I have is : - I see that most of tests are basic event checks (server/tests), and that there is not any performance/benchmarking based test for Spi

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH] spice-server.pc.in: move Requires to Requires.private

2011-10-23 Thread Liang Guo
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Alon Levy wrote: > On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 11:19:14AM +0200, Alon Levy wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 05:14:44PM +0800, Liang Guo wrote: >> > When using pkg-config, Requires and Requires.private field list >> > packages required by this package, but packages lis

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH] spice-server.pc.in: move Requires to Requires.private

2011-10-23 Thread Alon Levy
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 11:19:14AM +0200, Alon Levy wrote: > On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 05:14:44PM +0800, Liang Guo wrote: > > When using pkg-config, Requires and Requires.private field list > > packages required by this package, but packages listed under > > Requires.private are not taken into accoun

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH] spice-server.pc.in: move Requires to Requires.private

2011-10-23 Thread Alon Levy
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 05:14:44PM +0800, Liang Guo wrote: > When using pkg-config, Requires and Requires.private field list > packages required by this package, but packages listed under > Requires.private are not taken into account when a flag list is > computed for dynamically linked executable.

[Spice-devel] [PATCH] spice-server.pc.in: move Requires to Requires.private

2011-10-23 Thread Liang Guo
When using pkg-config, Requires and Requires.private field list packages required by this package, but packages listed under Requires.private are not taken into account when a flag list is computed for dynamically linked executable. In the situation where each .pc file corresponds to a library, Req

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH 0/6] Add new libspice-server.so APIs for injecting client sockets

2011-10-23 Thread Alon Levy
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 04:10:58PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > QEMU has a monitor command 'add_client' which can be used over > a UNIX domain socket connection with SCM_RIGHTS, to pass a > pre-opened client socket connection FD for graphics displays. > This series adds two new APIs for libsp

Re: [Spice-devel] Possible SPICE/QEMU deadlock on fast client reconnect

2011-10-23 Thread Yonit Halperin
Hi, Sounds like https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746950 and https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41858 Alon's patch: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/spice-devel/2011-September /005369.html Should solve it. Cheers, Yonit. On 10/21/2011 05:26 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote