On 10/03/2011 10:37 AM, Alon Levy wrote:
>
> Hi,
> won't there be an overhead for rendering on a non continuous
> surface? Will it be worthwhile comparing to not creating the
> surface?
If I use a scatter-gather list there is overhead of allocating and
copying the surface whenever I want to
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 10:09:40AM -0400, Richard Harman wrote:
> (is this list a bottom-posting list?)
We try for this mailing list to be human-readable yes. Are there lists
advocating top-posting?
Christophe
pgpUYBrXPms5v.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 10:09:40AM -0400, Richard Harman wrote:
> On 10/03/11 08:51, Alon Levy wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 08:38:27AM -0400, Richard Harman wrote:
> >> Heh, been a while since I did XDMCP - but here you go:
> >>
> >> For two screens: Xnest -scrns 2 -query yourbox :1
> >>
> >
On 10/03/11 08:51, Alon Levy wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 08:38:27AM -0400, Richard Harman wrote:
>> Heh, been a while since I did XDMCP - but here you go:
>>
>> For two screens: Xnest -scrns 2 -query yourbox :1
>>
> Xnest is segfaulting over here.. I'll try to figure out why,
> maybe you have
> maybe you have an alternative?
>
vncserver + vncclient on localhost ?
___
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 08:38:27AM -0400, Richard Harman wrote:
> Heh, been a while since I did XDMCP - but here you go:
>
> For two screens: Xnest -scrns 2 -query yourbox :1
>
Xnest is segfaulting over here.. I'll try to figure out why,
maybe you have an alternative?
> And if you're using GDM:
Heh, been a while since I did XDMCP - but here you go:
For two screens: Xnest -scrns 2 -query yourbox :1
And if you're using GDM:
[security]
DisallowTCP=false
[xdmcp]
Enable=true
On 10/03/11 03:55, Alon Levy wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 10:32:47AM -0400, Richard Harman wrote:
>> Attached
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Alon Levy wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 03:30:23PM +0200, Attila Sukosd wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I would be interested in contributing to the java client :)
> >
> >I've written a proof of concept python client so I have at least some
> >idea of
On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 03:30:23PM +0200, Attila Sukosd wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I would be interested in contributing to the java client :)
>
>I've written a proof of concept python client so I have at least some
>idea of what goes on behind the scenes :)
Is it based on the marshalling/de
On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 03:30:23PM +0200, Attila Sukosd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would be interested in contributing to the java client :)
>
> I've written a proof of concept python client so I have at least some idea
> of what goes on behind the scenes :)
One possible way of easily getting a python c
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 10:37:55AM +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 10:17:59AM +0200, Yonit Halperin wrote:
> > On 10/02/2011 03:24 PM, Alon Levy wrote:
> > >Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm trying to acheive the $subject. Some background: currently spice
> > > relies on a preallocated pci ba
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 10:17:59AM +0200, Yonit Halperin wrote:
> On 10/02/2011 03:24 PM, Alon Levy wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to acheive the $subject. Some background: currently spice
> > relies on a preallocated pci bar for both surfaces and for VGA framebuffer
> > + commands. I have bee
On 10/02/2011 03:24 PM, Alon Levy wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to acheive the $subject. Some background: currently spice relies
on a preallocated pci bar for both surfaces and for VGA framebuffer + commands.
I have been trying to get rid of the surfaces bar. To do that I allocate memory
in the gue
On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 10:32:47AM -0400, Richard Harman wrote:
> Attached is the log.
>
> I launched spicec from my third display (DISPLAY=:0.2), and it showed up
> on :0.0.
Any idea how to create a situation with DISPLAY=:0.2 when my physical machine
has only one card and it supports xrandr? Wh
On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 07:12:07PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 10/02/2011 04:31 PM, Alon Levy wrote:
> >On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 03:24:36PM +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >
> >Converting qemu's ram allocation to a mmap and using remap_file_pages seems
> >like it could work. Any ideas why
15 matches
Mail list logo
