On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 18:33 +0100, al...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Alexander Larsson
>
> This is a series of patches that clean up the "public" canvas API
> by hiding all the internals of the canvas implementation behind
> a single SpiceCanvas type with multiple constructors. It also removes
> th
From: Alexander Larsson
---
common/cairo_canvas.c | 455 -
common/canvas_base.c | 450
2 files changed, 450 insertions(+), 455 deletions(-)
diff --git a/common/cairo_canvas.c b/common/cairo_canva
From: Alexander Larsson
---
common/cairo_canvas.c | 96 -
common/canvas_base.c | 94 +++
2 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 96 deletions(-)
diff --git a/common/cairo_canvas.c b/common/cairo_canvas.c
From: Alexander Larsson
---
client/red_gdi_canvas.cpp |2 +-
common/cairo_canvas.c | 37 +
common/canvas_base.c | 41 -
common/gdi_canvas.c |6 --
common/gdi_canvas.h |3 ++-
comm
From: Alexander Larsson
---
common/cairo_canvas.c |9 ++---
common/cairo_canvas.h |3 +--
common/canvas_base.c | 21 +++--
common/canvas_base.h | 15 ++-
common/gl_canvas.c|9 ++---
common/gl_canvas.h|3 +--
server/red_worker.c
From: Alexander Larsson
It can still be NULL, but we simplify the headers by always including it.
There is no practical performance difference here.
---
common/cairo_canvas.c |7 +--
common/cairo_canvas.h |2 --
common/canvas_base.c | 13 -
common/gdi_canvas.c |8
From: Alexander Larsson
We use a dynamic interface similar to e.g. SpiceImageCache instead
of passing both function and opaque
---
client/canvas.cpp |7 ---
client/canvas.h |1 -
client/glz_decoder.cpp | 14 ++
client/glz_decoder.h|
From: Alexander Larsson
This is a series of patches that clean up the "public" canvas API
by hiding all the internals of the canvas implementation behind
a single SpiceCanvas type with multiple constructors. It also removes
the two canvas-type abstractions that existed before in server/ and
in cl
Thanks for the answer.
The faq says: I built Spice server on a 32-bit machine and it failed. What can
I do?
I've read the FAQ but was not aware if it is impossible by design to get
everything running on a single 32 Bit Linux.
Dor said: I guess it was only tested on 64 bit host, other tha
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 15:34 +0100, Stefan Zintgraf wrote:
> Thanks for the answer.
>
>
>
> The faq says: I built Spice server on a 32-bit machine and it failed.
> What can I do?
>
> I've read the FAQ but was not aware if it is impossible by design to
> get everything running on a single 32 Bit
On Sun, 2010-03-07 at 22:16 +0100, Stefan Zintgraf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i have two questions regarding SPICE.
>
> a) 32-bit support
> I want to run a Windows guest on a 32-Bit Ubuntu system (version 9.10). The
> client shall also run on the same (32-Bit) machine. According the FAQ (and my
> exper
On 03/07/2010 11:16 PM, Stefan Zintgraf wrote:
Hi,
i have two questions regarding SPICE.
a) 32-bit support
I want to run a Windows guest on a 32-Bit Ubuntu system (version 9.10). The
client shall also run on the same (32-Bit) machine. According the FAQ (and my
experience...) i cannot build th
Hi,
i have two questions regarding SPICE.
a) 32-bit support
I want to run a Windows guest on a 32-Bit Ubuntu system (version 9.10). The
client shall also run on the same (32-Bit) machine. According the FAQ (and my
experience...) i cannot build the server (libspice) on 32-Bit Ubuntu.
As a resu
13 matches
Mail list logo
