Hi Martin,
your list looks good, but I'd like to include the following items:
1st:
Configurational changes we deem necessary to make Arch Linux 32 running
and maintainable (e.g. we obviously have a separate mirror list and an
extra keyring). - Or did you mean to cover this in your 2nd point?
2nd
Well, when it's default, then I have no objections.
regards,
Erich
On 14.02.19 16:35, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Erich Eckner [2019-02-14 11:23]:
>> Yes, this is fine for me. However, maybe we can put your comment about
>> Arch Linux into (3), too? Like adding ", pr
iwj.1-amended-2004-08-10.iwj.1, a copy of which
> can be found at
> https://www.spi-inc.org/corporate/resolutions/2004/2004-08-10.iwj.1/
>
> 2. Erich Eckner is recognized by SPI as the authoritative decision maker
> and SPI liaison for Arch Linux 32. Successors will be appointed by th
On Tue, 5 Mar 2019, Ian Jackson wrote:
Jimmy Kaplowitz writes ("Re: Resolution 2018-07-11.mm.1: Arch Linux 32 as associated
project"):
In such a circumstance, the SPI Board will, in its good-faith
discretion, proceed as follows: the Board will identify one or more
other SPI associated projects
