Re: Phone number for donations?

2013-05-11 Thread Bdale Garbee
Hilmar Lapp writes: > Has a Google Voice number been considered? Nope. The fact that I can't recall anyone ever asking for a phone number before probably means this is a fairly rare occurrence... Bdale pgpyO0Cdq9sQJ.pgp Description: PGP signature _

Re: Phone number for donations?

2013-05-11 Thread Mason Loring Bliss
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 09:51:09AM -0600, Bdale Garbee wrote: > Nope. The fact that I can't recall anyone ever asking for a phone > number before probably means this is a fairly rare occurrence... A private phone number sufficed here. I can't see great utility in adding to process complexity unl

Re: Phone number for donations?

2013-05-11 Thread Joshua D. Drake
On 05/11/2013 08:51 AM, Bdale Garbee wrote: Hilmar Lapp writes: Has a Google Voice number been considered? Nope. The fact that I can't recall anyone ever asking for a phone number before probably means this is a fairly rare occurrence... I think it is perfectly reasonable to expect that

Re: Phone number for donations?

2013-05-11 Thread Ean Schuessler
- "Joshua D. Drake" wrote:   > I think it is perfectly reasonable to expect that a corporation have a   > phone number. The fact that we don't is actually rather embarrassing. A   > simple forwarding number that can be redirected as needed should be in   > place. You can get a 1-800 num

Re: Phone number for donations?

2013-05-11 Thread Josh Berkus
Folks, While this hasn't come up often, it's also easily fulfilled. Let's just get a Google Phone number. It can ring Michael, Bdale and me. It'll be free, and we can forget about it. --Josh ___ Spi-general mailing list Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org

Re: Phone number for donations?

2013-05-11 Thread Jeremy Baron
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: > While this hasn't come up often, it's also easily fulfilled. Let's just > get a Google Phone number. It can ring Michael, Bdale and me. It'll be > free, and we can forget about it. FYI, one problem I noticed with that plan in the past is th