On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 08:34:15PM -0700, Bruce Perens wrote:
> I think it would have worked out to be more fair to
> everyone had Command Prompt Inc. established its own foundation for
> Postgres.
Based on
http://www.postgresql.us/mission/
I guess this is now more or less happening?
Chee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 13:07:33 +1000
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 08:34:15PM -0700, Bruce Perens wrote:
> > I think it would have worked out to be more fair to
> > everyone had Command Prompt Inc. established its o
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 01:07:33PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 08:34:15PM -0700, Bruce Perens wrote:
> > I think it would have worked out to be more fair to
> > everyone had Command Prompt Inc. established its own foundation for
> > Postgres.
>
> Based on
>
> http:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 23:39:09 -0400
Jimmy Kaplowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Josh, care to give a more clear answer publicly on this list to both
> of those questions? Remember that many people on this list don't know
> the difference between Po
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 09:16:22PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Hope that helps.
It clears things up for me very nicely, thanks.
- Jimmy Kaplowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Spi-general mailing list
Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org
http://lists.spi-inc.org/l
